Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gab0
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 11

    weird kmer content in illumina PE reads

    Hello

    My name is Gabriel. I'm writing here because I'm analyzing Illumina reads (generated in a Hiseq 2000) from a genome of a particular insect species. So far, I've managed to remove the adapter sequence (including the indexed adapter), but when checking my filtered FastQ files with the latest FastQC version (V 0.11.2) I am seeing a weird kmer pattern in the 5' region, it seems that a particular sequence is over represented, but the overrepresented sequence module does not show anything weird.

    Also, the Kmer content overrepresented has a strong bias towards GC (i.e GGCCCGG, GCCCGGG and so on). I've also managed to overlap the Kmers to this sequence GGGCCATACTAGTACTGGATGCATCTGCAGGATATCGCGGCCGC but so far I've not been able to find anything related to this particular sequence. I'm concerned wheter it is OK to just trim this sequence, as I don't know how which meaning has this particular pattern.

    So far and during my web search, I've only seen similar patterns when analyzing RNA-seq data, but this is not the case. Also, the "bad sequence" example from FastQC webpage shows a similar pattern, but in the 3' end, not in the 5' region, as this is my scenario.

    It is worth noting that I have Paired end (2x100) files, and both files (1 and 2) have the same pattern.

    I have attached the Kmer module graphs, I can add more information if needed.

    Thank you very much, (and sorry for my english :P)

    Gabriel
    Attached Files
  • svitlana
    Member
    • Jun 2017
    • 16

    #2
    Hello gab0!

    I am facing the same problem as you and I would like to know whether you found out where the sequence GGGCCATACTAGTACTGGATGCATCTGCAGGATATCGCGGCCGC comes from?

    Thank you!

    Comment

    • jdk787
      josh kinman
      • Apr 2014
      • 72

      #3
      Hello Svitlana
      I looked at this sequence from your other post http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78247 and the reverse complement matches TruSeq Process controls CTA-150bp, CTA-450bp, CTA-550bp, and CTA-850bp.
      Josh Kinman

      Comment

      • svitlana
        Member
        • Jun 2017
        • 16

        #4
        Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
        Hello Svitlana
        I looked at this sequence from your other post http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78247 and the reverse complement matches TruSeq Process controls CTA-150bp, CTA-450bp, CTA-550bp, and CTA-850bp.
        You are right jdk787, sorry I didn't see your first response. Thank you again!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...