Does anybody know if the solid 4hq is anywhere close to being released or if anybody has any idea of the day-to-day throughput of the machine?
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Last I heard, 4hq was slated for release at the end of the year. I have also heard that unlike all previous upgrades, this 4hq will be expensive. On the order of $100,000 (USD). So that probably means a new camera to support smaller bead sizes? Possibly other changes to allow longer reads (75 bases)?
Here is a link to a story back in the spring:
v4
--
Phillip
-
From the link below, it sounds like PI will be available in Dec and HQ in March next year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chipper View PostMakes sense to change the name if it is a completely new instrument... Not sure what the 5500 would stand for though, something with a new encoding scheme or the error rate?
ABI, for whatever reason, used to go with serial number-like product names. The earliest slab gel sequencers were all 37x, where "x" was 0, 3 or 7. Then the 48/96 capillary sequencers that followed were 37x0 where "x" was a 0 or 3.
So the sequencer that followed the 3730XL should have been the 37000. But ABI, by this point, presumably realized that names were easier for most people to remember than numbers. I don't see them going back to the old naming methods.
Sad, in a way. Knowledge of an ABI sequencer name once meant something. It was a shibboleth. If someone started talking about running a 377 you knew they did probably did not come by this knowledge lightly. More than likely they suffered, just like you did, pouring those slab gels without bubbles. And if you related your problems with "red rain", they might well weep in empathy with you.
On the other hand, no instrument I've ever used has a "misery index" even approaching that of the SOLiD. (I'll define this index as the cost of a lost run multiplied by the length, in days, of a run.)
--
Phillip
Comment
-
Sorry Phillip (go Boilers!), but I'm not joking or mistaken. During the talk of the Life Tech. sequencing platforms, there was a slide showing both instruments w/ the new names, and he said that we were one of the first groups of people to hear that new info. The speaker was Michael Rhodes, Senior Manager - Sequencing, from Life Technologies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RCJK View PostSorry Phillip (go Boilers!), but I'm not joking or mistaken. During the talk of the Life Tech. sequencing platforms, there was a slide showing both instruments w/ the new names, and he said that we were one of the first groups of people to hear that new info. The speaker was Michael Rhodes, Senior Manager - Sequencing, from Life Technologies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RCJK View PostYes, 1 slide for Pi, 2 for HQ. I don't recall any other specific differences. I believe they both use the same chemistries and software.
Chemistry-wise, I understood they would be offering a new 5-base encoding chemistry that could be used along with the normal 2-base encoding chemistry to allow conversion to base space reads with out the normal error propagation issues. (Or, at least, the errors would propagate a maximum of 5 bases.)
No word on either of those capabilities?
--
Phillip
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
58 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
54 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
45 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment