There are no conversations in this channel.
Please log in to your account to view your subscribed posts.
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 responses
13,374 views
0 reactions
|
by lkral
09-03-2014, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
51 responses
224,273 views
0 reactions
|
by gringer
08-27-2014, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
19 responses
32,925 views
0 reactions
|
by AllSeq
06-08-2014, 09:17 PM
|
|||
|
0 responses
17,936 views
0 reactions
|
by AllSeq
05-08-2014, 09:25 AM
|
|||
|
0 responses
17,506 views
0 reactions
|
by AllSeq
04-21-2014, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
80 responses
266,655 views
0 reactions
|
by ymc
03-21-2014, 09:38 AM
|
|||
|
3 responses
17,721 views
0 reactions
|
by DaleYuzuki
03-10-2014, 09:45 AM
|
|||
|
2 responses
14,740 views
0 reactions
|
by krobison
09-13-2013, 05:06 AM
|
|||
|
5 responses
14,541 views
0 reactions
|
by BBoy
09-12-2013, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
1 response
15,879 views
0 reactions
|
by vishnuamaram
07-31-2013, 10:51 PM
|
No topics found.
widgetinstance 229 (Webinars) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
-
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...07-09-2026, 11:10 AM -
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM