There are no conversations in this channel.
Please log in to your account to view your subscribed posts.
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Closed, Sticky:
A brief review of recent ChIP-Seq tools literature
|
20 responses
88,655 views
0 reactions
|
by sameet
04-26-2010, 04:40 PM
|
||
|
5 responses
3,862 views
0 reactions
|
10-27-2016, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
2 responses
5,225 views
0 reactions
|
10-27-2016, 03:45 AM
|
|||
|
6 responses
4,850 views
0 reactions
|
|
|||
|
9 responses
5,726 views
0 reactions
|
by clolalan7
10-14-2016, 04:52 AM
|
|||
|
0 responses
2,613 views
0 reactions
|
by yjhua2110
10-10-2016, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
0 responses
2,071 views
0 reactions
|
by ge2sasag
10-07-2016, 01:44 AM
|
|||
|
1 response
3,148 views
0 reactions
|
10-03-2016, 11:03 PM
|
|||
|
1 response
4,406 views
0 reactions
|
by fkrueger
09-13-2016, 04:29 AM
|
|||
|
1 response
6,653 views
0 reactions
|
by SeleneT
08-30-2016, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
0 responses
5,839 views
0 reactions
|
by tesa
08-18-2016, 12:38 AM
|
No topics found.
widgetinstance 229 (Webinars) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
-
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
-
I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.
Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before... -
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...06-02-2026, 10:05 AM