Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ecrandall
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 1

    Targeted sequencing of anonymous regions

    We are trying to develop a panel of anonymous regions "randomly" sampled around the genome for population genetic purposes (so we would like to be able to run this panel on 100s of samples). These would be quite small - anywhere from 100 to maybe 1200bp long.

    Thus far we have been investigating PCR-based amplicon sequencing using our own set of previously developed primers in a multiplex PCR reaction. While we have reasonable coverage in our test runs on just 48 loci (~100x on a 314), most of the reads are non-specific - blasting to the taxon of interest, but not the amplicons in our panel.

    Our thoughts so far are that the multiplexing is amplifying too many non-specific regions and that it might be better to submit our regions of interest to a design process.

    My first question is whether a PCR-based approach (such as ampliseq) or a hybridization/capture approach (such as targetseq) will work better for our particular application.

    In addition, are there any particular kits that others have had success with? Beyond the ABI kits, we are especially interested in IDTs Xgen Lockdown (as it would allow us to build our panel slowly and sequentially), and possibly in Agilent's Haloplex.

    Thanks for any advice you might have.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...