Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RNA-seq: Expression levels and polymorphisms

    Hello from beautiful Santa Cruz, CA!

    I am interested in identifying variable expression levels as well as sequence polymorphism between conspecifics in different environments all in one fell swoop and it seems that RNA-seq is the right tool for this mission. However it seems that detecting variable expression levels requires ample coverage for sensitivity purposes while detecting polymorphisms (i.e. SNPs) doesn't require as much depth. Is it safe to assume that if you obtain sufficient coverage to detect variable expression that you will have the power to detect polymophisms? Are there any models for estimating sufficient sequencing depth to achieve the desired power to detect expression differences? I am working with teleost fishes with ~1Gb genome.

    Any insight into the pros and cons of RNA-seq library preps (price and efficacy) would also be greatly appreciated!

    Cheers,
    Gary

  • #2
    RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

    I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

    The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jparsons View Post
      RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

      I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

      The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.
      Hi jparsons,

      Thanks for the reply! I should have been more specific, I am not looking for SNPs that correlate to changes in expression but want to be able to detect both variable expression levels and SNPs between individuals from different populations. For instance in a MHC complex gene I'd like to be able to identify SNPs or other polymorphisms between individuals and, at the same time, be able to identity different expression levels of say some metabolic gene.

      Cheers,
      Gary

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin


        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X