Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How to compare de novo and reference mappings in SNPs analysis?

    Hello. I am a beginner in this field and I have a question, sorry if it is obvious !

    In SNPs analysis (by Stacks software) with FASTQ sample files (from Illumina), I perform 2 different analyses:
    – the first one is a reference mapping: the FASTQ sample files are aligned with a FASTA genome file by Bowtie or BWA softwares, then the SAM result files are analysed by Stacks and a TSV text result file is generated (with informations like chromosome and base positions, consensus sequences, SNPs, alleles variations, etc.);
    – the second one is a de novo mapping: the FASTQ sample files are directly analysed by Stacks and a TSV result file is generated (with the same informations as first case);

    I would like to compare the results of these 2 analyses (reference versus de novo).

    Firstly, I sorted the lines inside the 2 result files (keeping only the consensus sequence informations) and performed a text comparison with Meld software, but this method has one weaknesse: one difference in the consensus sequence will result in a total mismatch…

    Secondly, I generated a FASTA file from the de novo's TSV result file which was analysed after by the same aligner as first case (Bowtie or BWA, generating a SAM result file), in order to obtain position informations, and again I sorted the files (keeping only the consensus sequences and position informations) and performed a comparison with Meld, but again this method has some weaknesses: a small difference in consensus sequence or in the position (on the same chromosome, for example) will also result in a total mismatch… I also noticed that many matching sequences have a position difference of 1 base for the exactly same consensus sequence…

    I would like to know if there are softwares which can help me, for example by making an alignment between the short sequences of these 2 files (SAM or TSV/CSV text files), if possible taking into account the position informations (obtained from the first alignment with a reference genome: chromosome and base position), without forgetting that my purpose is to compare results in SNPs analysis.

    Thank you very much for your time and your potential help.

    Sincerely yours.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
31 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X