Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cip
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 5

    Real performance of HiSeq 2000

    Hello, what is the 'real world' performance of HiSeq 2000 using 2x100 PE?

    Illumina says 374 million/lane; so 374e6 x 2 x 100 = 74.80 Gb/lane.

    According to Illumina: 80% percentage of Bases > Q30

    74.80*0.80 =~ 60Gb.

    However looking in web pages of sequencing centers the 'real value' ranges between 40-60Gb/lane.

    Thank you very much.
  • MLog
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 36

    #2
    When they say 374 million/lane, they mean 374 millions of 100bp reads, or 187 millions of 100+100 reads. This gives ~ 37 Gb. In our hands, we usually get 30-40 Gb, with Q30 ~90%.
    It is possible to get a bit more, 40-45 Gb, but I would not recommend this.

    Comment

    • simonandrews
      Simon Andrews
      • May 2009
      • 870

      #3
      We would normally hope to get 200 million reads from a lane these days. We've had quite a few runs from the Sanger centre lately which have been averaging nearer 100 million though. On a good day you can get 250+ million so the yield you get can vary by a factor of 3 depending on how optimally everything worked. Quality to the end of a 2x100bp run is pretty consistently good these days and we remove very little by quality trimming.

      Comment

      • cip
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2013
        • 5

        #4
        Hi simonandrews, thank you.

        When you say 200 million reads, do you mean paired reads (100 + 100) or single reads (100bps)?

        Thanks.

        Comment

        • simonandrews
          Simon Andrews
          • May 2009
          • 870

          #5
          200 million clusters, so 400 million reads from a 2x100 paired end run.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            The numbers Simon is presenting are for well constructed libraries.

            Every library run on a HiSeq does not yield this many reads per lane.

            Comment

            • cip
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2013
              • 5

              #7
              Ok I think I understand you now. But please correct me if I am wrong. So if you have 400 million reads from a 2x100 paired end run (from 200 million clusters) ... You would get 40Gb from a lane?

              However your output from a lane can range between 20-50 Gb (100-250 million reads) depending on how optimally everything worked.

              Comment

              • simonandrews
                Simon Andrews
                • May 2009
                • 870

                #8
                Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
                The numbers Simon is presenting are for well constructed libraries.
                We only make well constructed libraries

                If only...

                Comment

                • GenoMax
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 7142

                  #9
                  Originally posted by cip View Post
                  Ok I think I understand you now. But please correct me if I am wrong. So if you have 400 million reads from a 2x100 paired end run (from 200 million clusters) ... You would get 40Gb from a lane?

                  However your output from a lane can range between 20-50 Gb (100-250 million reads) depending on how optimally everything worked.
                  Output will range from 0 - 50 Gb (specially if you had not QC'ed your library before running it)

                  That aside the estimate you are using is reasonable.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  18 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                  0 responses
                  19 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  21 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  54 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...