Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Biswapriya
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 3

    Quality of Assembly based on Ion Torrent Data (microbial genome)

    Hi All !

    After some good exercise with data, I obtained following results as follows: Ion-Torrent Data for a 5 Mbp microbial genome: Acquired 3, 435, 101 high-quality filtered reads, average read length of 180 bp, assembled using MIRA/ CLC Assembler, & got: 350 Contigs (> 500 bp CO), mean contig size: 17 kbp, 110 X Coverage; N50 Contigs: 32 kbp, largest scaffold: 89 kbp, 6000 ORFs/CDSs.

    What looks unreasonable/ unacceptable/ gross ? Please feel free to advice and comment ! Just wish to check out and find flaws.

    Thanks in advance,
    Biswa
  • jonathanjacobs
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 23

    #2
    For single read 200bp data - In our experience with the PGM running 200bp reads - that's about right. You'll be lucky if you break 100K for your largest contig for most bacterial genomes with single end reads on the PGM.

    Your best bet would be to jump to 400bp reads. The larger chips won't really help much either, so stay with 316 or even a 314 and save some cash.

    Alternatively - you can go for mate-pair sequencing; which on the PGM is actually quite good with the right library prep.
    @bioinformer
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathanjacobs

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...