Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fraca
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 8

    Pool-seq Nextera or Truseq

    Hi to all,
    This is my first post and I'm new to NGS world, I found this forum very interesting and useful.
    For my PhD I have to do a GWAS study on Arabidopsis lyrata. I have about 50 population (25 individual per pop) and I want to find the correlation between the climatic variable and the SNPs.

    The approch that I would like to use is pooled whole genome resequencing. Pooling the individuals of one population, making one library for each population and sequencing that on Hiseq. Finally get the population alleles frequencies.
    For making the library there are two kits Nextera and Truseq. I prefer to use the Nextera because need less DNA, it is used for resequencing studies and the protocol is easy, fast and cheap compare to Truseq.

    Has someone use the Nextera kit for sequencing pooled sample?


    thanks
  • SNPsaurus
    Registered Vendor
    • May 2013
    • 525

    #2
    Sure, Nextera works fine for a pooled population. Since you want to estimate the population allele frequency, don't skimp on the input amount and keep the number of PCR cycles down. You may have some issues calling alleles that are present in a single heterozygous individual, since that would be at a 2% frequency. So some extra quality filtering might be needed to avoid sequencing errors showing up at that frequency.
    Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

    Comment

    • fraca
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks SNPsaurus

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...