Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    Good peak finders for methylation data?

    Hey all,

    I'm back in the nextgen sequencing game for this summer. Working with methylation data for the first time. I have a series of cases and controls of MBD-seq data and would like to find differentially methylated peaks/regions between the two, and additionally I want to simply be able to call peaks in any given sample. Are there any standard peak callers out there that are good for this type of thing (or is there a good review that covers this to some degree)? I would very much appreciate any input.
  • qiangsong
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 1

    #2
    A good review of genome-wide methylation profiling techniques, including MBD-seq, is

    Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data by Christoph Bock published in Nature Reviews Genetics (http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v1...l/nrg3273.html)

    As far as I understand, the analysis of MBD-data should be similar to ChIP-Seq, expect
    in MBD-Seq one may need to normalize for CpG density etc.


    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    Hey all,

    I'm back in the nextgen sequencing game for this summer. Working with methylation data for the first time. I have a series of cases and controls of MBD-seq data and would like to find differentially methylated peaks/regions between the two, and additionally I want to simply be able to call peaks in any given sample. Are there any standard peak callers out there that are good for this type of thing (or is there a good review that covers this to some degree)? I would very much appreciate any input.

    Comment

    • Heisman
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 534

      #3
      That is most definitely relevant to my interests! Thanks a ton; I'll go through that tomorrow for sure.

      If anyone else has feedback feel free to chime in, of course.

      Comment

      • Heisman
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 534

        #4
        Alright all, I have fairly thoroughly gone through a decent amount of literature for DMR determination. I'm still curious about peak calling.I have case and control samples (ie, cancer vs. healthy), but otherwise no "background" sample.

        It seems like a lot of papers use MACS, with some other programs such as USeq possibly being better in review comparisons with ChIP-Seq data. I have thus far only found one peak caller specifically written with methylation enrichment data in mind (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?...eq+Technology\), called BALM, and there they show they can call distinct peaks that are convoluted with better resolution than other callers such as MACS. There are other ways to calculate DMRs without calling peaks but I'm specifically interested in peak calling for the purpose of this thread.

        For those of you who have done this and are more knowledgeable than me, have you used BALM, or have you found any other caller that would noticeably be more applicable than MACS?

        Comment

        • asiniard
          Junior Member
          • May 2011
          • 3

          #5
          Hi Heisman, Did you ever find a solution? I'm looking for something similar now. Thanks~!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...