Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zslee
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 29

    about David, why one gene is calculated 3 times ?

    have anyone used David to do function enrichment analysis on line ?
    i have got one line like bellow:

    Category Term Count % PValue Genes List Total Pop Hits Pop Total Fold Enrichment Bonferroni Benjamini FDR

    GOTERM_MF_ALL GO:0015924~mannosyl-oligosaccharide mannosidase activity 3 2.70% 0.0026231466883225325 ENSG00000177239, ENSG00000177239, ENSG00000177239, 89 9 10048 37.63295880149813 0.998814050394877 0.9655623809603076 4.540783108986657

    that is in this GO:0015924 term, there're 3 genes, but identical, is this bug?
    thanks
  • steven
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 269

    #2
    curious indeed.. did you find out where this comes from?
    Was the ensembl id triplicated in the original list of gene?

    Comment

    • zslee
      Member
      • May 2009
      • 29

      #3
      i 've checked that, this gene id exist only once in both my test gene list and background
      i don't know the resason yet ...

      Comment

      • steven
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 269

        #4
        if you find out the reason, could you please let us know? thanks a lot!

        Comment

        • zslee
          Member
          • May 2009
          • 29

          #5
          the reason is 3 different David gene id (that they used when do enrichment analysis) mapped to 1 ensemble gene id, the following is the answer from the David Guys:

          Ensembl gene id was integrated as a secondary source in the production version of DAVID. Therefore, the coverage is not the best and there are cases where there may be mappings for one Ensembl id to multiple DAVID ids. The latter is the problem with your examples. In the case of ENSG00000198744, it was mapped to 3 DAVID ids which is what is reflected in the chart report. We have recently finished a complete database update that now incorporates Ensembl gene id as a primary source which ensures a mapping of one ensembl id to one DAVID id and with full coverage of Ensembl. The new data is available through our Beta site( http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov:8080 ). Please give it a try and let us know what you think.

          Comment

          • steven
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 269

            #6
            OK I see.. thanks for sharing!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...