Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Denovo assembled genome quality

    I recently assembled a genome using my PE 100 reads and got these datas
    N75 336
    N50 451
    N25 650
    Minimum 101
    Maximum 6,123
    Average 428
    Count 171,034
    Total 73,189,397





    Can anyone tell me that whether they are OK or not?

  • #2
    You could not get your genome published in that form (it is too broken up) so in that aspect the answer is "no". On the other hand you might be able to get some useful information from what you have assembled. You could also deposit the reads and the assembly into SRA or another archive.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by westerman View Post
      You could not get your genome published in that form (it is too broken up) so in that aspect the answer is "no". On the other hand you might be able to get some useful information from what you have assembled. You could also deposit the reads and the assembly into SRA or another archive.
      Thanks for reply. Actually I want to use this assembled genome for differential expression analysis. Is it OK for that?

      Comment


      • #4
        It's not ideal for that because the fragments are generally shorter than what you would expect for full-length genes. Before using that assembly, I would do whatever possible to improve it, either by better using the existing data (different preprocessing, different assembler, etc) or generating more data.

        Comment


        • #5
          Usually a person will do rna-seq for differential expression analysis (DEA) and not bother with a whole genome assembly. Of course there are other ways to do DEA. I am not sure what your assembly will get you.

          BTW, just as double check, in your first post you were talking about a whole genome project, correct? I ask because will your numbers are poor for a whole genome project they are not bad for a rna-Seq project ... if that is indeed what your biological sample was.
          Last edited by westerman; 09-03-2014, 10:26 AM. Reason: Added some explanation.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by westerman View Post
            Usually a person will do rna-seq for differential expression analysis (DEA) and not bother with a whole genome assembly. Of course there are other ways to do DEA. I am not sure what your assembly will get you.

            BTW, just as double check, in your first post you were talking about a whole genome project, correct? I ask because will your numbers are poor for a whole genome project they are not bad for a rna-Seq project ... if that is indeed what your biological sample was.
            Actually I assembled this using RNAseq data using CLC genomics workbench. I am a newbie in this field. Am I doing something wrong?

            Comment


            • #7
              Ah. rna-seq data. That explains it. I do not use CLC myself and unsure if they have a tools for creating denovo transcripts. In my experience there is a big difference in how assembly of a genome and assembly of a transcriptome are approached however in a quick reading of the CLC literature it does not seem like they make such a differentiation.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                by seqadmin




                The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
                04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
              • seqadmin
                Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                by seqadmin


                Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:47 AM
              0 responses
              11 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
              0 responses
              60 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
              0 responses
              59 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X