Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Genotype association help

    Dear All,

    Please forgive my ignorance I am new to association studies. Please provide me with some comments and insight on what I would like to achieve.

    Maim goal:
    I have genotyped 100+ individuals for 40 SNP makers and would like to associate a genotype with particular phenotypic trait etc.

    Phenotypes:
    1. I have several phenotype traits I would like to associate a genotype with.
    2. The individuals are also group into different class based on several phenotype observations.
    What I have read so far is that I can add phenotypic trait to a phenotype file to be used with plink. With regards to the groups do I treat each group as a "phenotype" and also add these to the phenotype file I will be using with plink.

    Results
    What I would like to achieve in the end is for each group a representative genotype. Would this be possible any help would be appreciated, if possible examples of ped,map and pheno files would also be appreciated as this is what I am aslo unsure of as to how to represent this is the different files.

    Thanks

  • #2
    Any insight help would be appreciated.

    Have I posted in the wrong section?
    Last edited by Altair; 11-09-2015, 09:34 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      A genome-wide association study using 40 SNPs is almost completely useless, and very likely to net useless false positive associations when testing against a large array of phenotypes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks for the response.
        I do believe I am not expressing myself clearly I apologies.
        The 40SNPs that have been chosen have been associated with the phenotypes/traits in previous studies (published) so the association to the phenotype/trait does indeed exist. I would like to determine if a specific SNP call ( A/G or A/C ) has a effect on the trait/phenotype.

        Example:
        These are just to explain what I would like to achieve and not real cases.
        Using on 2 markers for this example and 8 plants (same species).

        Marker 1 : associated with flower colour
        Marker 2 : associated with plant height
        Plant 1 Flower colour : Red
        Plant 2 Flower colour : Yellow
        Plant 3 Flower colour: Red
        Plant 4 Flower colour : Yellow
        Plant 1 height : 60cm (classified as tall)
        Plant 2 height : 45cm (classified as average)
        Plant 3 height : 52cm (classified as average)
        Plant 4 height : 62cm (classified as tall )
        So results for
        Plant Marker 1 Maker 2
        1 A/A C/A
        2 A/T C/T
        3 A/A C/T
        4 A/T C/A
        Given the example results if a seedling of a plant is test for bother markers and Marker 1 is A/A is could be hypothesized that it will have red flowers and Marker 2 is C/T it would be of average height.

        I do hope this helps.

        Thanks

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin


          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
          Yesterday, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        41 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X