Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Seqasaurus
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 24

    calculating expected reads

    Hi,

    we are currently trying to decide how to process our 16S amplicons on titanium. How would I come to a rough estimate of expected reads per sample on 1/8th PTP at 16-plex? (assuming everything is perfectly normalized).

    I am under the impression that splitting the plate reduces sequencing output overall but am unsure as to how great a decrease to expect in output to expect.

    Cheers,
    Paul
  • ulz_peter
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 219

    #2
    Hi,

    The sequencing method manual states that with the 1/8th PTP you could assume 80,000-120,000 reads. That means 5000-7500 reads per sample at 16-plex assuming perfect normalization of the samples.
    Furthermore it says one could expext 450,000-650,000 reads per region when dividing the plate in 2 parts which would result in 900,000-1,300,000 reads per plate. Dividing the plate in 8 parts could yield a maximum of 640,000 - 960,000 reads / plate.

    Best regards,
    Peter

    Comment

    • RCJK
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 156

      #3
      Hi there,

      The number of reads output for amplicons is less than for shotgun libraries. 1/8th of a PTP should give you 65,000-100,000 HQ reads. A half plate would give 360,000-520,000. These numbers are from Tech Bulletin 13-2009 re: Amplicon Fusion Primer design guidelines.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...