SEQanswers

SEQanswers (http://seqanswers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Bioinformatics (http://seqanswers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   BFAST and Variant Calling (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15861)

nexgengirl 11-29-2011 08:59 AM

BFAST and Variant Calling
 
Hi,

I have a question regarding variant calling with SOLiD data. For the mapping, I used BFAST and for variant calling I'm trying to use GATK.

The problem occurs when I run the quality score recalibration and also the unified genotyper. Whenever I run these I get an output that says many of my reads were filtered because they don't have a mapping quality (The MappingQualityUnavailableFilter contains nearly 90% of my reads, also see here: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wi...TK_release_1.1).

In other words the mapping quality was 255 which in a sam/bam file means the quality is unavailable.

Here (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawik...apping_Quality) it seems the mapping quality of 255 is actually very good.

I'm confused as to how to work around this problem. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Chipper 11-29-2011 09:06 AM

I had the same problem, my solution was to change the mapping quality. This issue is supposed to be fixed in the latest version of BFAST, so an better option would be to realign reads with mapQV 255. Or just use Samtools mpileup.

nexgengirl 11-29-2011 09:47 AM

Thanks Chipper.

If I may ask what did you find was an appropriate change for the mapping quality? Could it merely be changed to 254 or is it more complex than that? Thanks again.

Chipper 11-29-2011 12:57 PM

As long as it is not 255 it is ok, but if the alignments with score 255 are unreliable it would be better to set it to a lower value.

nilshomer 11-29-2011 05:34 PM

Try upgrading to the newest version as Chipper suggests, then report back.

nexgengirl 11-29-2011 07:08 PM

I will try again using the new version (0.7.0a). Before I used 0.6.5a. My only concern is that the manual for the new version on page 39 also says "If a read has one alignment, then the mapping quality is set to 255." Is there another option I should specify to avoid getting a score of 255?

nilshomer 11-29-2011 07:14 PM

I would welcome feedback, but I think the calculation should produce a lot fewer 255s. If you find that it does, perhaps I should update the manual.

nexgengirl 12-03-2011 08:23 AM

Thanks Chipper and nilshomer! I reran using the new version and now there are no reads failing this filter: MappingQualityUnavailableFilter

It seems to be working much better now.

Thanks again.

priesgo 01-02-2013 06:03 AM

Let me retake this old issue.

I am working with 1000 genomes project alignments data and they have done their SOLiD alignment with bfast 0.64e, so I have two options: I redo the alignment myself with a newer version of bfast as it is said above; or I try to handle the 255 before GATK.

Handling the 255 mapping qualities requires replacing this values with something else in the interval [0, 254]. Any ideas on this?

I am trying to do it with samtools calmd mapping quality capping option.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.