Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NGS whole genome sequence versus sequence capture for quality control

    Hi there,

    I am trying to compare NGS whole genome sequence data (two strains, one with x26 coverage and the other with x21 coverage) and custom agilent sequence capture of selected regions from the the above mentioned strains but with very high coverage (x10,000). Both data were analysed using the same pipeline.

    Aim:
    To get a percentage of how reliable my NGS data is compared to sequence capture.
    and the way I am thinking of doing it is by either extract the SNPs from NGS data SNPs/indel using the targeted regions that were used in the custom sequence capture and then compared how many snps were missed by the NGS analysis. or I can pull the snps at earlier point of the analysis.

    What I need to know is:
    (a)What i wanted to know is what do you think of this approach, specially i have not seen it yet done by other group yet ? (if it did could you please let me know about this article).

    (b) is there another way of comparing both dataset for quality control

    (c) Also I wanted to know what are other possible benefits from doing such comparison ? if you think it is a good idea?

    Cheers

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin


    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
    Yesterday, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
39 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
41 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X