![]() |
BWA aligned pairs read1=XT:A:U, read2=XT:A:R
Hello,
I've aligned Illumina paired end reads with BWA, filtered using samtools view -f 3 -F 12 ("proper pairs", both mates mapped). I'm looking at the XT tags and see expected classes, where both mates are XT:A:U (both "unique") and XT:A:M + XT:A:U (one mate-rescued, one "unique"). However, I also find a class of paired reads where one read is XT:A:R (multiply-mapped) and the other is XT:A:U. This class of reads is a significant fraction of the total pairs (~10%) and the class persists after filtering on MAPQ > 20. I anticipated that this class of reads would instead be classifed in the XT:A:M + XT:A:U (ie XT:A:R converted to XT:A:M), but apparently not. Are the XT:A:R whose mate is XT:A:U mate-rescued, or something else? Thanks. |
I have exactly the same question and I haven't been able to find more detailed information on the XT:A:M tag from BWA.
I created a simple example (on my blog at http://davetang.org/muse/2014/07/24/...red-end-reads/; specifically the "RESCUING AMBIGUOUSLY MAPPED READS" section) trying to obtain the XT:A:M tag by aligning a uniquely- and multi-mapping pair but I got the XT:A:U and XT:A:R tags instead. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.