SEQanswers (
-   General (
-   -   trimming BGI adapters (

jgroh 02-12-2019 05:44 PM

trimming BGI adapters
1 Attachment(s)

I have paired-end 100bp reads generated from BGI-seq 500. The sequencing center did some adapter removal trimming before delivering the data but there appears to be a fraction of reads which still have putative adapter sequences. I am making this judgement based on the presence of 'overrepresented kmers' at the start and ends of both forward and reverse reads seen in the output of FastQC. I've included an image of this module output for one particular sample as an attachment.

The overrepresented kmer at the 3' end match the beginning of the 3' adapter sequence, which makes sense, and I assume this is due to cases where the insert size is less than the read length, so the reads sequence into the adapter on the other side of the genomic fragment.

What is confusing me is that the overrepresented kmers at the 5' end of reads contain what looks like partial sequence of the 5' adapter sequence, but degraded at the 3' end, which I wouldn't expect, and also with one base pair position variable. I wouldn't necessarily expect sequencing error either as the quality scores are generally very high at the start of the reads.

Here is the 5' adapter sequence provide by the sequencing center:
5' adapter AAGTCGGATCGTAGCCATGTCGTTCTGTGAGCCAAGGAGTTG. The underlined part is what is appearing in fragments at the start of reads, and the position in bold is variable among these. Libraries were prepared by the sequencing center, and the sequencing technology is still a bit unclear to me, so I'm not sure whether this is a true artefact. Has anyone seen this patterns in the data from BGI before? I may just leave the data as is and proceed with mapping, as these reads are a small fraction overall, but I'm trying to understand what might be going on....


Rnasoup 03-03-2020 07:11 AM

Probably is a bit late for you, but I hope this may help other people. I struggled to find out the sequences to trim adapters from BGI/MGI sequencing data. At the end, I found a pdf with the oligos used for library prep

Normally I use grep to inspect the adapters, but with BGI/MGI it was confusing because I found that there are often mutations in the adapters (I rarely see it when looking Illumina data).

In short, for paired-end, this cutadapt command found adapters in around 10% of the read pairs in this dataset.



Melissa 03-27-2020 02:18 AM


Thanks Rnasoup for sharing the link to the sequencing adapter. I tried to find it but nothing showed up in google.

I hope jgroh resolved the adapter issue. It does look quite strange.

By the way, how do you find the data quality of MGI sequencer in terms of error rate etc?


Rnasoup 04-01-2020 06:42 AM

Thanks Melissa,

I am not sure which data quality you mean. Anyway, I donīt have much experience with MGI sequencing, I have just had to dig into it to analyze the GEO dataset that I mentioned in my post, so all I had was the fastq raw data. I guess you can run any software to extract quality information from the fastq files, like Picard tools.

Good luck

Melissa 04-02-2020 05:43 AM

Hi Rnasoup,

Thanks for your reply. What I meant is the data quality in terms of reported phred score vs observed phred score, substitution/indel error rate, problematic region for variant calling etc. Some metrics similar to this thread on a new sequencer.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.