SEQanswers

SEQanswers (http://seqanswers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Bioinformatics (http://seqanswers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   No peak in BBNorm kmer-frequency histogram (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73171)

TomHarrop 12-18-2016 05:04 PM

No peak in BBNorm kmer-frequency histogram
 
2 Attachment(s)
Hi,

I'm working on de novo assembly of an insect genome. Our paired-end libraries were made from 10 ng of sheared DNA using a Rubicon ThruPLEX kit with 9 cycles of PCR. The bioanalyzer trace shows a mean insert size of 476 bp, and we sequenced around 120 million 125 base read-pairs from this library. We're expecting a genome size of around 500 Mbp (but that's a pretty rough guess).

I'm having trouble getting contiguous assemblies. Among others, I've tried edena (L50 = 287 bp as reported by BBTools stats.sh) and velvet (L50 = 482 bp). I'm new to de novo assembly but 9 cycles of PCR sounds like a lot to me, and I'm wondering if the library complexity is too low. Also, fastqc reports a GC content of around 30 % which I know can exacerbate PCR bias.

To troubleshoot, I'm looking at the before and after kmer-frequency histograms generated by BBNorm during normalisation (below). I can't see a peak in either histogram, but I'm not sure what that means. Can anyone help me interpret these plots or suggest further troubleshooting steps?

In case it's relevant, the processing I did before assembly is: quality trimming (Q < 30 at 3 end) and adaptor trimming (TruSeq indexed adaptor and TruSeq universal adaptor) with cutadapt; contaminant filtering using PhiX, sequencing_artifacts and adapters_no_transposase references (BBDuk); normalisation and error correction to target k-mer coverage of 57 (BBNorm).

Please let me know if any more information would help.

Thanks for reading,

Tom

Brian Bushnell 12-18-2016 05:48 PM

It looks to me like low library complexity due to overamplification. It's hard to say, though. Note that there is a peak at ~16x. In order to see it, you have to rotate the image to the left by 45 degrees... the fact that it is such a weak peak indicates a very wide spread of coverage, indicative of overamplification, or an extremely high error rate. Or severe contamination, which can also be a problem with low-input amplified libraries. Do the reads generally BLAST to related insects?

TomHarrop 12-18-2016 07:48 PM

Hi Brian, thanks for the reply. Contamination sounds quite possible, I just BLASTed a random subset of the reads and got human, macaque, trees, zebrafish etc. as well as the occasional hit on other insects. Uh oh.

Our server is going offline tonight but I'll do a more systematic investigation tomorrow and post the results.

TomHarrop 12-21-2016 02:13 PM

I blastn-ed 1000 R1 and 1000 R2 reads from this library against the 'nt' database. For R1, I got 544 hits with an evalue < 1. 493 of them had usable taxon identifiers. From that I got 89 plant hits (18%), 82 mammalian (17%), 65 insects (13%), 63 nematodes and 57 fish (and some other stuff). R2 numbers were similar.

I don't know if evalue is the best way to look at BLAST results for NGS reads (i.e. short queries), but either way it looks like contamination to me.

Thanks for the hint.

WhatsOEver 12-22-2016 12:00 AM

I'd suggest to do the contamination analysis is a more systematic way using biobloomtools with a couple of the different top hit plants, mammals, insect, ... genomes you got from Blast. It will probably take some time, but I'd be rather surprised if you really have so many different contaminations - as long as the person doing your library preps isn't also a dedicated gardener or fisherman ;)

Brian Bushnell 12-22-2016 01:43 AM

Yes, to be honest, this does sound strange. Normally, contamination comes from 1 or 2 sources... a grab-bag of taxa is very unusual. Are you getting 100% identity to anything, or just weak hits?

WhatsOEver 12-22-2016 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Bushnell (Post 202332)
Yes, to be honest, this does sound strange. Normally, contamination comes from 1 or 2 sources... a grab-bag of taxa is very unusual. Are you getting 100% identity to anything, or just weak hits?

And in addition: Do you get your complete read seq aligned or are your hits rather the tiny 20-40bp local alignment crap Blast may output if there is nothing more suitable?

EDIT: Just saw that you used Blastn. I'd suggest megablast here.

TomHarrop 12-27-2016 11:12 PM

Thanks for the replies. Sorry about the slow response, I missed the email notification over the holidays.

You're correct, the hits are mostly less than 60 bp, not the full read. I did try megablast but I don't get any hits (well, 11 out of 1000 reads had hits, about half to insects).


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.