Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ron128
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 38

    #1

    Variant Calling from paired end RNAseq data

    Hello everybody, since everybody is getting on the variant calling from RNAseq bandwagon, my P.I wants to get in on the party as well. Too bad for overworked ppl like me So I have this huge dataset of illumina paired end rnaseq which I am trying to run through GATK. I am taking the accepted_hits.bam file from tophat/cufflinks as the input file for GATK. My reference for the tophat/cufflinks pipeline was UCSC annotated genes (knownGenes.gtf) and UCSC hg19 reference.

    My pipeline for gatk is:
    convert bam>sam, sort sam> insert read groups> fixmates using picard> sam to bam> remove duplicates > reindex bam > realign indels

    When i Run the indel realignment for GATK, I get the following error: contig chr 1 missing from reference. So i go ahead and look it up, and use the reorder sam option in picards tools. I modify my pipeline as follows:

    convert bam>sam, sort sam> insert read groups> fixmates using picard> createdictionary.jar for hg 19 reference using picard > reorder sam >
    sam to bam> remove duplicates > reindex bam > realign indels

    My error is not solved even after reordering the sam file and i still get the same error of "chr1 contig not found in your reference"

    Is it something to do with the references I have been using? I have used hg19 reference both for my tophat/cufflinks as well as the GATK pipeline.

    Thanks a ton in advance!
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    How are you making your .sam? I'm pretty sure that bwa sampe will add read group in for with the -r option.

    And I think Picard would add them to a .bam. I'm pretty sure you do NOT have to expand your .bam to a .sam in order to do that.

    And you double-cheked to make sure that the name of Chr 1 is exactly the same between your .bam and your reference genome?

    Comment

    • ron128
      Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 38

      #3
      Hey thanks for a quickie reply Like i said, I am not redoing any alignments here. I have already run the tophat cufflinks pipeline on my data to assemble it into known transcripts using UCSC genes and hg 19 as a reference. SO this way I already have access to an "accepted_hits.bam" as an output from the tophat runs. I am using this accepted_hits.bam as my alignment file for GATK and converting this to a sam file using Picard tols. I am skimming down on my analysis time by not redoing the alignments.

      to your query about whether I checked the reference and my sam file for the chr1, yea i did. And this is what is troubling me. I am using the same reference for both my rnaseq and variant calling. So logically there shouldnt be any discrepancies. I was wondering if anybody has faced the same issues when using gatk for variant calling in RNAseq? I am pretty new to this so I might me messing up somewhere in the pipeline..

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      38 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...