Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahabnar
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 1

    to aligning all reads with SHRiMP (as automatic)

    Hi,

    I'm new in SHRiMP. I have 10 library and for each library, i had used the splitreads.py of SHRiMP to 1000 files. Then, i have 1000 files csfasta type for on library. I had test some of them with rmapper-cs... to align and it's working but i need to run the same command as automatically for the 1000 files csfasta first and for all 10 library.
    The command line is like:
    ./rmapper-cs -m 8 -i -30 -g -35 -e -7 -x -25 -h 70% -v 65% -M 35bp,fast -o 100 -U /root/Desktop/SHRiMP_1_3_0/readsT/1000_to_1999.csfasta /root/Desktop/DB.fasta > /root/Desktop/SHRiMP_1_3_0/results/res_1000_to_1999.out

    I try with command find like this one:

    #!/bin/bash
    #

    find /root/Desktop/SHRiMP_1_3_0/readsT/ -name "*.csfasta*" -exec /root/Desktop/SHRiMP_1_3_0/bin/rmapper-cs -m 8 -i -30 -g -35 -e -7 -x -25 -h 70% -v 65% -M 35bp,fast -o 100 -U "{}" /root/Desktop/docShrimp191009/DB.fasta >> /root/Desktop/SHRiMP_1_3_0/results/"{}"res_U_lib1.out {} \;

    but it said bad file and nothing in result file

    Do you know what's the problem

    ps: {} is just to have the name of the file in result, it does't working but for the input file it's ok

    ravelna

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...