Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ynwh
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 16

    Tools to perform QC of methylation calling

    Hi,

    My BS-seq mapping generated different methylation level value (count_C/(count_C+count_T)) at different bases. Some values are very low (~0.07). I wonder if there is a widely accepted threshold to filter unreliable methylation calling or any tool can do this?

    Many thanks
  • PeteH
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 64

    #2
    To clarify, are you wanting to identify cytosines that show evidence of methylation and thus you want to filter out any with low estimated levels of methylation that you think might be simply attributable to 'error' (be that sequencing error, bisuflite-conversion error, mapping error, base calling error, etc.)?

    If so, you might have a read of the supplementary material of Lister et al. (Nature, 2009 and 2011: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19829295, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21289626). They use a binomial test to "[establish] the minimum threshold number of cytosines sequenced at each reference cytosine position at which the position could be called as methylated, so that out of all methylcytosines identified no more than 1% would be due to the error rate."

    I don't know of any software off-hand that implements this test for BS-seq data but it is a simple binomial test that could be implemented in, for example, R.

    I would be reluctant to use a simple threshold (e.g. 0.3) because the estimated methylation level is a function of the coverage in BS-seq, as is the standard error of your estimate. And I don't think there is a "widely accepted" threshold. That said, this paper (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598999) does provide thresholds, although the paper they cite is a study using microarrays (where thresholds may be more justified) rather than BS-seq.

    Hope this helps,
    Pete

    Comment

    • ynwh
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 16

      #3
      Pete,

      Many thanks for your answer. That's really helpful.

      Comment

      • chadn737
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 392

        #4
        You really need a control for you BS treatment, an unmethylated genome which was also treated with BS so that you can estimate the conversion. In plants the chloroplast genome serves as a convenient internal control, otherwise you should spike in lambda phage in your samples. That is essential to the calculations used by Lister et al.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...