Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sht41
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 1

    Help needed for exomeCNV

    Hi there,

    I am now working on a project of CNV analysis of exome sequencing data. By using exomeCNV, so far I obtained DepthOfCoverage files by GATK for all 8 samples.

    The problems are:
    1. The 8 samples all 8 cases, no paired controls available.
    2. If I use one as control and all others as cases, by using classify.eCNV I can get the results of one comparison. How can I combine the results of all comparison into one?

    Thanks!

    sht41
  • shruti
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 35

    #2
    Hi..

    I am running ExomeCNV too.. but facing another issue
    I used bam2coverage.sh for DFepth of coverage and I get files for each chromosome, however when I read the files then I see that the coverage is calculated for all the chromosomes for each file and they have different outputs (below) did you have the same output?

    -clustershell-3.2$ head tumor.chr1.exon_parsed.coverage
    probe chr probe_start probe_end targeted base sequenced base coverage average coverage base with >10 coverage
    probe1 chr1 3206095 3207055 961 961 104089 108.3132154 961
    probe2 chr1 3411761 3412001 241 241 10022 41.58506224 241
    probe3 chr1 3660595 3661075 481 481 115178 239.4553015 481
    probe4 chr1 3670956 3671556 601 601 54714 91.03826955 601
    probe5 chr1 4334491 4334641 151 151 6045 40.03311258 151


    -clustershell-3.2$ head tumor.chr2.exon_parsed.coverage
    probe chr probe_start probe_end targeted base sequenced base coverage average coverage base with >10 coverage
    probe1 chr1 3206095 3207055 961 1870 263547 274.2424558 1642
    probe2 chr1 3411761 3412001 241 11824 1521051 6311.414938 11815
    probe3 chr1 3660595 3661075 481 3962 577520 1200.665281 3958
    probe4 chr1 3670956 3671556 601 0 0 0 0
    probe5 chr1 4334491 4334641 151 1445 189457 1254.682119 1445


    Also running the R script for few chromosomes gives me an error

    Error in if (lim.logR[1] == -Inf) lim.logR[1] = min(all.ecnv$logR[all.ecnv$logR != :
    missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
    Calls: do.plot.eCNV
    Execution halted

    Any help would be really great..

    thanks

    shruti

    Comment

    • ymc
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 496

      #3
      Maybe you can pool 7 of them as control and 1 as case? Then repeat this process for eight times and you have data for 8 cases.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...