Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • someperson
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 9

    Velvet + meta-velvet:which fastq format for paired-end infos?

    Hi,
    I've been doing some metagenomic assemblies using meta-velvet. I've been using paired-end data for mor reliable assemblies. However, when I wanted to check those assemblies (e.g. using tablet) I could not find the paired end info any-more.
    I've recently learned that fastq-formats have changed not only with respect to quality values, but also with respect to paired-end info.

    Old format:
    @HWUSI-EAS100R:6:73:941:1973#0/1
    New Format (that I am using):
    @EAS139:136:FC706VJ:2:2104:15343:197393 1:Y:18:ATCACG
    (paired-end info bold and underlined)

    So Mira for example needs the old format and will just ignore paired-end info it doesn't recognize (without warning!) if you use the new Format.

    Does anybody know which Format Velvet and Meta-Velvet use? Are my assemblies now all in reality single-read assemblies?
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    Velvet + meta-velvet:which fastq format for paired-end infos?

    I have been using velvet with the new formats of MiSeq and HiSeq PE data, and it works fine.

    By the way, in the read that you have used to illustrate the new format, the Y (1:Y:18:ATCACG) indicates a read that has not passed Illumina's QC filter step.

    Usually the sequence providers remove those reads.

    Comment

    • muol
      Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 10

      #3
      Velvet ignores fastq headers and replaces them with its own (fasta) headers anyway. You just have to make sure that input read pairs are either shuffled in one file, or synced if separate files are used.

      Comment

      • someperson
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 9

        #4
        @mastal
        Thanks, but the example reads I've posted are not mine. they are from the wikipedia page illustrating the differences between the fastq-formats.
        @mastal+@muol:
        But then how can I check the assemblies with regard to paired-end Infomation? With Mira, for example, I know that you still get assemblies (without error-messages) if you use the wrong format. The assemblies will just in reality be based on single-read assemblies. So how can one really make sure if everything is ok, if the paired-end info is left out from the AMOS-file, the sequence-list and everything? (This just intrigues me. For some contigs i would simply like to check how well supported they are by paired reads. Also a lot of reads are not assembled or dropped from the assembly. I would like to see what has happened to their corresponding partners)
        Last edited by someperson; 07-04-2013, 08:29 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        44 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...