Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EmmaUoW
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 2

    Two-step PCR protocol for Illumina sequencing

    Hi everyone,

    This is my first post, so apologies if it is in the wrong place or if there is already a thread on the same topic!

    I am currently trying to optimise a protocol to process 380 samples using the Illumina MiSeq platform. I am using the two-step PCR process to attach the necessary adapters to my samples in preparation for sequencing.

    From doing a bit of reading around, there seems to be no standard protocol for doing this, everyone seems to adapt depending on the samples they are looking at. Am I right in saying this?

    So far, I have used the same master mix components and concentrations previously used to successfully amplify my samples in the first step PCR. I am now trying to test different cycle numbers to see what the minimum number required is and trying a hot-start version of the master mix I use to reduce non-specific amplification. I was then going to clean-up and quantify before adding a set amount of DNA template for each sample to the second PCR (using same master mix and primer concentration etc as the first PCR) and then quantify again before pooling and denaturing to load onto the machine. I looked at the Nextera sample preparation guide and this states 12 cycles for the second PCR which seems a bit much as that kit amplifies sequences from transposon tagged genomic DNA, but this means I am unsure how many cycles is enough. I added the two quantification steps in as these samples have not been quantified before as they were so difficult to amplify in the first place.

    I was just wondering if anyone had any suggestions or recommendations? Apologies for such a long post!
  • microgirl123
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 199

    #2
    Are you using Nextera or Nextera XT adapters? I use the Nextera adapters, 5cycles (this is what the Nextera guide Rev. B calls for) with the conditions in the guide, and 50 ng of input DNA (quantified by Qubit for concentration and Nanodrop for 260/280 and 260/230). Afterwards, I quantify with the Qubit for pooling and then KAPA quant the final library.

    Comment

    • EmmaUoW
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2013
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for your reply. I am using Nextera XT adapters. The program in the guide says 12 cycles but I think this may be a little over the top. I was planning on doing the first PCR in as few cycles as possible, then purifying the products and quantifying them with Qubit and the Nanodrop and then using 50ng DNA of each sample in the second PCR beofre quantifying again and pooling. I think I just need to the cycle numbers for each PCR right!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...