Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JEdwards
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 2

    Bioinformatics Position at Washington University

    Job Description
    We have an immediate opening in the Center for Pharmacogenomics at Washington University in St. Louis for an informatician to study epigenomic abnormalities in cancer. Our team is conducting cutting-edge research developing new experimental and computational genomic tools to understand the nature of genome-wide DNA methylation abnormalities in cancer.

    In this position, you will provide key support to the research team as well as engage in challenging and rewarding research projects of your own. Primary responsibilities will be to work closely with experimental biologists to develop new tools to visualize and analyze genomic methylation patterns. This will include integration of methylation, expression and other genomic datasets. Salary is competitive and commensurate with experience.

    Required Qualifications
    Bachelor's degree with emphasis in computer science, engineering, informatics or other related discipline. The applicant should have proficiency in C/C++ and a scripting language such as Perl or Python.

    Preferred Qualifications
    Excellent verbal and written communication skills. Strong work ethic and demonstrated ability to work independently and interact as part of a team. Preferred qualifications include: experience with MySQL or R, additional experience in computational genomics or related biomedical research, familiarity with Next-Gen sequencing applications, and experience with large-scale expression or epigenetic datasets.

    Contact
    Please send cover letter, CV and contact information for 3 references in PDF format to Dr. John Edwards ([email protected]).

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...