Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zchou
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 13

    looking for reference genome based assembler for short-reads

    Hi All,

    I want to use comparative-based assembler for short-reads for assembling mRNA-seq. For example, if we have human tissue mRNA short-reads, we want to reassemble the short-reads into transcripts by comparing with human genome, which software is more suitable for this task?

    I found AMOScmp-shortreads might be useful for this purpose, but when I read the manual, I found AMOScmp do not support fastq format. I also don't know the performance for this software.

    In further, do anyone compare the performance of de novo based assembler with reference-based assembler for mRNA-seq?

    Thanks,
    ZCH
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    The RNA-Seq section of the software wiki at this site has 14 entries; not all of them perform mapping but you should find several tools there which might be candidates for your needs.

    Comment

    • zchou
      Member
      • May 2009
      • 13

      #3
      As the lists of this webpage "Software packages for next gen sequence analysis" includes many different tools for mapping/assembling. However, no any software designed for this purpose. MAQ has limited function to generate the consensus sequences based on mapping. However, it seems MAQ can only use reads length lower than 63bp. As I listed, AMOScmp-short-reads is only software I know to provide this function, but weak support for paired-end illumina GAII sequences files(qseq) or fastq.

      Comment

      • Xi Wang
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 317

        #4
        Check Tophat and Cufflink.
        Xi Wang

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...