Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mimmy86
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 3

    Bisulfite seq format file, help!

    Hi everyone,
    I'm new in methylation analysis and I downloaded a public bisulfite seq data, but I cannot tell what the file format is .
    The file ends in a bs-call.basecall.

    The file contents is:
    chr1 131398 CC 12 0 -
    chr1 131399 CC 12 0 -
    chr1 131400 CC 13 0 +
    chr1 131401 CC 13 0 +
    chr1 131402 CG 2 11 +
    chr1 131403 CG 4 10 -
    chr1 131404 CA 13 0 +
    chr1 131407 CC 13 0 +
    chr1 131408 CC 13 0 +
    chr1 131409 CC 15 0 +
    chr1 131410 CA 15 0 +
    chr1 131412 CA 15 0 +


    Do you know this kind of file?

    Thank a lot!!!!!
    Mimmy
    Last edited by Mimmy86; 10-25-2013, 07:20 AM.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    It would help if you gave a URL. Particularly if this is a GEO dataset, there's probably a description somewhere. Having said that, it looks like: chromosome, position, context, unmethylated count, methylated count, strand. Context gives the nucleotide position following the C in question (these days, you'd see CpG, CHG, or CHH rather than what you have).

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      From this GEO record: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/quer...?acc=GSM922329 comes following tidbit

      Supplementary_files_format_and_content: Methylation calls files for C's in the bsmap alignment files were generated using methratio.py
      Seems to be similar to what Mimmy86 is reporting.

      Comment

      • Mimmy86
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2013
        • 3

        #4
        Hi,
        thaks for your replay!
        As you said i took this data from GEO GSM922329.
        I examined methratio.py manual in bsmap and I find an output file description that confused me.
        The description is
        Output format: tab delimited txt file with the following columns:
        1) chromorome
        2) coordinate (1-based)
        3) strand
        4) sequence context (2nt upstream to 2nt downstream in Watson strand direction)
        5) methylation ratio, calculated as #C_counts / #eff_CT_counts
        6) number of effective total C+T counts on this locus (#eff_CT_counts)
        CT_SNP="no action", #eff_CT_counts = #CT_counts
        CT_SNP="correct", #eff_CT_counts = #CT_counts * (#rev_G_counts / #rev_GA_counts)
        7) number of total C counts on this locus (#C_counts)
        8) number of total C+T counts on this locuso (#CT_counts)
        9) number of total G counts on this locus of reverse strand (#rev_G_counts)
        10) number of total G+A counts on this locus of reverse strand (#rev_GA_counts)
        11) lower bound of 95% confidence interval of methylation ratio, calculated by Wilson score interval for binomial proportion.
        12) upper bound of 95% confidence interval of methylation ratio, calculated by Wilson score interval for binomial proportion.

        Comment

        • fkrueger
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 627

          #5
          If the description on GEO (...produced by methratio.py) and the actual format are not matching you should probably contact the authors directly (also so that they can update the description on GEO). Looking at the file I am pretty sure though that Devon's assessment is correct.

          Comment

          • Mimmy86
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2013
            • 3

            #6
            thanks, I also think that Devon's assessment is correct. I tried to calculate the Cmethylation frequency using the 4th and 5th columns. do you think that i can continue on this frequencies?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...