Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlacencio
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 13

    RNA-seq: concern about quantification of transcriptome

    Hi everybody!

    I'd like to generate and quantify whole transcriptomes by using RNA-seq in the near -- well, not so near -- future but I am completely newbie on this method.

    My doubt concerns mainly the quantification capacity of RNA-seq: how can RNA-seq be used to quantify transcripts if a PCR amplification has to be done after the adapter ligation in the library preparation setp? How can this amplification step not impair the post-sequencing quantification of transcripts?

    Is the amount of PCR-amplified products directly proportional to the initial amount of cDNAs in this case?

    Thank you in advance!

    Marcio
  • Chipper
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 323

    #2
    There will be some sequence-specific bias in the amplification but usually one compares the same sequences (genes) under different conditions, and with fragmented samples which makes it less of a problem. It is possible to use molecular identifiers (random sequences) in the adaptors to account for PCR bias (google qRNA-seq or "Counting absolute number of molecules using unique molecular identifiers" for more info).

    Comment

    • mlacencio
      Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 13

      #3
      Hi Chipper! Thank you for your reply!

      Actually my main concern is about the number of PCR cycles. It is known that the quantification of PCR products is unreliable if PCR reaches its saturation level. In general, how many cycles are allowed in the amplification step of a library prep for RNA-seq?

      Thank you again!

      Comment

      • benjamir
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 4

        #4
        Hi Mlacencio,
        The Illumina TruSeq RNA-seq protocol calls for 15 cycle (total RNA 0.1 ug - 4 ug optimized).
        A recent single-cell method, Quartz-Seq, performs 21 cycles of whole transcriptome amplification PCR prior to 10 - 12 cycles of library PCR.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...