Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • samhokin
    Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 20

    six huge read count outliers on neighboring transcripts on one lane - theories?

    This is a purely academic question since these particular transcripts are not of particular interest to us (and they're only bad on one out of 71 lanes), but I'm curious as to what the theory may be for what happened to these particular reads.

    The setup is that we've run 71 Arabidopsis samples, one per lane, at Otogenetics, and they sent the data over to DNANexus for read mapping against TAIR9. I've downloaded the mapped read counts and used them in DESeq, edgeR, etc. The data is really good, quite consistent across the lanes for almost all transcripts.

    Except this one lane, lane #30, has six huge outliers in neighboring transcripts on chromosome 4:

    at4g12470 799 bp from Chr4:7,401,109..7,401,907
    at4g12480 833 bp from Chr4:7,406,105..7,406,937
    at4g12490 786 bp from Chr4:7,409,621..7,410,406
    at4g12500 778 bp from Chr4:7,414,150..7,414,927
    at4g12510 568 bp from Chr4:7,417,236..7,417,803
    at4g12520 683 bp from Chr4:7,421,056..7,421,738

    I've attached a plot below (SVG) that shows these six plus the neighboring two transcripts that look perfectly normal. If this were a microarray assay I'd say there was a scratch on the plate; but with RNA-Seq, any simple explanation?

    Last edited by samhokin; 11-10-2013, 08:33 AM.
    Sam Hokin
    Computational Scientist, Carnegie and NCGR
  • phdveg
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 2

    #2
    Data outlyer

    This is Natalie from Otogenetics. I would like to discuss your data with you to see if there is anything on our end that could help. Unfortunately I cannot tell which sample has your outlying data. Could you contact us at [email protected] or give us a call? I would be happy to discuss the sample offline.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    44 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    51 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...