Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • strob
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 84

    de novo assembly (velvet or others)

    Dear all,

    is velvet (or others) able to use a read twice in the assembly of two different contigs or does velvet need in this case two duplicates of this read?

    It could be that in certain genes highly conserved domains are present. In order to be able to assemble the different genes, certain reads could be used more than once. Is this possible in velvet (or others)?

    The reason why I ask this is because I filter my dataset for duplicated reads, thereby only keeping the "unique" ones. But I wonder now if I do not lose information by doing this. If velvet (or others) is able to use reads more than once, the filtering is fine; if not, I should keep all my reads.

    Any comments more than welcome.

    Many thanks in advance,

    Steven
  • jts
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 22

    #2
    Velvet and other de Bruijn graph assemblers (abyss, Euler-SR) are able to re-use reads. Each instance of the read contributes the same k-mer path to the graph so removing redundant copies does not effect the structure of the graph. That said, you should not filter the data as most assemblers track the number of times each k-mer exists in the input data. This information is used for error correction/removal and to infer the copy count for each segment in the graph which can help resolve repeats.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    9 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...