Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mra
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 7

    DESeq2: diff gene expression between species using gene-specific normalization factor

    Hi.

    I'm trying to do differential gene expression analysis between the orthologous genes of two species. Leaving aside the technical and biological complications that this kind of analysis carries, I would like to use DESeq2 to perform the computations.

    To do so, I'm thinking in take advantage of the gene-specific normalization factors (NF_i,j) of DESeq2, which are used, alongside the common scale quantity q_i,j, to define the expected value of observed counts in gene i and sample j (mu_i,j):

    mu_i,j = q_i,j * NF_i,j

    Since in my case besides differences in the library size between samples, I also have to take care of the differences in gene length between species, I'm using a form of NF_i,j defined as:

    NF_i,j = s_j * L_i,j

    Where L_i,j is the length of gene i on condition j, and s_j has the same meaning that in regular analysis but is computed using length-normalized counts:

    s_j = median_i { ( k_i,j / L_i,j ) / [ Prod_{v=1,...,m} k_i,v / L_i,j ]^(1/m) }

    I would greatly appreciate any comments on the soundness (or lack of it) of this approach. Better ideas to do the analysis are more than welcome.

    Thanks,
    mra
    Last edited by mra; 12-14-2013, 11:30 AM.
  • Michael Love
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 333

    #2
    hi,

    This looks correct to me.

    So you counted genes using different gene models for each species?

    Comment

    • mra
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Hi Michael.

      Yes, I used species-specific annotations files.

      Comment

      • Michael Love
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 333

        #4
        Then I think your formulation looks correct.

        Comment

        • Michael Love
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 333

          #5
          This question came up a few more times, so we implemented an argument normMatrix to estimateSizeFactors() (DESeq2 >= 1.6). So normMatrix would be L in your case. The estimateSizeFactors() function will then correct for library size taking into consideration this matrix of multiplicative factors, as you have done above but additionally ensuring that the mean of normalized counts is on the same scale as the mean of unnormalized counts by dividing out the geometric mean. Then it stores a normalizationFactor matrix which combines both normMatrix and the library size correction. The code itself can be seen in DESeq2:::estimateNormFactors (an unexported function).

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • mylaser
            Reply to Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by mylaser
            Kheloyar – Everything You Need to Know About Kheloyaar Login and Kheoyar Id
            If you are looking for an online gaming platform that offers a user-friendly experience, Kheloyar has become a name that many users search for. Whether you're interested in creating a new account, accessing your dashboard through Kheloyaar Login, or learning how to obtain a Kheoyar Id, understanding the platform's features and account process is essential.
            This guide explains everything you need to know about...
            Yesterday, 01:13 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          12 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...