Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jiangyue0203
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 1

    Unexpected signal in 700-1000bp region by Agilent Bioanalyzer

    Hi guys!

    I keep having a problem with the final RNA-seq liabrary size. After enrich DNA fragments, everything seems to be OK on the electrophoretogram with DNAmaker I (see attached thumbnails) and we chose gel-method to obtain the fragments (300-400bp) and purified using MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN). BTW, we eluted the liabrary by 25ul RNA-free water instead of QIAGEN buffer EB.

    Then we used Agilent Bioanalyzer to obtain the exact fragments size and found every sample had a unexpected signal between 700-1000bp region!(see attached thumbnails)

    Does anyone have this problem before? Do you have any idea what can cause this unexpected signal? I swear no irrelevant fragments were extracted during my experiments.

    Many thanks!!!
    Attached Files
  • newmoon
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 11

    #2
    it could be ssDNA if you do to many cycles of PCR

    Comment

    • james hadfield
      Moderator
      Cambridge, UK
      Community Forum
      • Feb 2008
      • 224

      #3
      You've over amplified the library with too many PCR cycles and are seeing a "bubble' product. This is where the PCR reaction runs out of primer but annealing means the ends of 2 non-complementary inserts anneal at P5/P7 creating a bubble fo single stranded DNA in the middle. This run differently on the Bioananlsyer

      You can QT with qPCR and seqeunce as normal but might want to adjust your PCR cycles down.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...