Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • silvi
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 7

    GS junior amplicon seq - remove adapters

    Hi,

    does anyone know how I can remove adapters in Roche GS junior sequencing (multiplexed)?
    I just got the MIDs and primer sequences, but when I look in the fna-file there seems to be more adapter sequence inside.

    Thanks for your help!
  • sklages
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 628

    #2
    In general you can freely use all Roche software, in your case the "SFF Tools" for demultiplexing and general SFF file handling, and "GS Amplicon Variant Analyzer (AVA)" software for amplicon analysis. That is still a good option for analyzing amplicons.

    AVA has the advantage of being controlled via GUI *or* command line interface.

    You just need to fill out the software request form at:


    hth,
    Sven

    Comment

    • silvi
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 7

      #3
      Thanks a lot. Actually I'd like to avoid commercial software or is that for free?
      I intended to use flexbar for removal of MID/primer sequences and then STAR to align against the transcriptome.

      Comment

      • sklages
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 628

        #4
        The Roche software can be used for free.

        From another post from you I got the impression your are working with amplicon data. Is that correct?

        Comment

        • silvi
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 7

          #5
          Yes that is right. So far I just worked with Illumina and no amlicon data.
          So I was also searching for an open-source workflow for variant analysis.

          Comment

          • sklages
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 628

            #6
            If you just have a few amplicons/exons to cover than AVA is a good option. We use it routinely for smaller "candidate gene projects". As it is also command-line driven, the scripts serve as documentation as well.

            Apart from this "SFF Tools" are a good option to deal with SFF in general (MID splitting, file conversions etc.).

            Comment

            • silvi
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 7

              #7
              Thanks a lot so far!
              The problem is that actually AVA has already been applied (I got ".fna" files to analyze) and the task was to retrieve similar results by a second independent analysis.
              As I can see in the data, neither MIDs or primers have been removed yet.

              Comment

              • sklages
                Senior Member
                • May 2008
                • 628

                #8
                ok, you already have SNP tables output by AVA and you want to check the results by some other software ..

                Nevertheless you don't want to just remove MID sequences, but separate the data by MID. For the preprocessing I'd still go for SFF Tools.

                For the analysis of the amplicons comparable to AVA there are not too many choices ..

                Apart from VIP_pipeline I have no idea .. maybe you'll find something here http://omictools.com/

                Comment

                • silvi
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 7

                  #9
                  At least I have some xls report files. I do not understand their output so far.
                  Sorry for misunderstanding. Of course I just removed the primers and separated the files according to MIDs.
                  Thanks a lot so far! I will check your recommendations!

                  Comment

                  • swe5191
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2013
                    • 6

                    #10
                    Assembly results of 454 data using Trinity

                    Hi,
                    I have performed Trinity denovo assembly using DDBJ pipeline. and I got the following assembly stats as result :
                    Contig # : 5,009
                    Total contig size : 2,205,041
                    Maximum contig size : 3,288
                    Minimum contig size : 201
                    N50 contig size : 475

                    My original data set contained 81146 reads and after preprocessing like quality check and trimming I got 72018 reads.. How do I interpret this result? Is this assembly result a reasonable one?

                    Comment

                    • martin2
                      Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 42

                      #11
                      Originally posted by silvi View Post
                      Hi,

                      does anyone know how I can remove adapters in Roche GS junior sequencing (multiplexed)? I just got the MIDs and primer sequences, but when I look in the fna-file there seems to be more adapter sequence inside.
                      I developed one tool to find and remove not only MIDs but also primers/adapters/artifacts from any 454 reads (works also on some IonTorrent and Illumina datasets but that's another story). I don't know of any other tool doing that so precisely. The tricky part is how to remove the MIDs on the right side of a read. They are often obfuscated by a number of sequencing or systematic errors and searching for just 10 or 11nt is asking for a trouble. Not even Roche released a software handling the MIDs on the right side (only on the left side). If the software is smart enough it can search for the MID and for the downstream adapter at once taking advantage of longer alignments. Sadly, in the case of multiplexed samples there are lots of combinations to be tested before one can judge what MID and adapter is in the sequence. Seems you have realized there are multiple PCR products stitched together via MID linker ... yes, this happens, quite a lot, not only in amplicon sequencing.

                      Unfortunately, I offer offer only a commercial data processing service ( http://www.bioinformatics.cz/softwar...rted-protocols ), which does not fullfill your requirements. There is way too much work in it.
                      Last edited by martin2; 03-20-2014, 01:41 PM. Reason: URL change, English corrections

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                        ...
                        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                        ...
                        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 12:17 PM
                      0 responses
                      13 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                      0 responses
                      14 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
                      0 responses
                      23 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                      0 responses
                      37 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...