Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sergio.pv
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 21

    Is 30000 reads too low for mapping (miRNAs)

    Hello community,
    I have just received a fastq file of a study i am conducting.
    It had an overall poor quality, and after filetering reads according to quality and size (minQV=17, min length=16), the number of reads decreased from 95428 to 29635. And the quality increase markedly.

    My question is if it would be still possible to use those ~30000 readss fro mapping.


    Best regards and thanks!
    Sergio
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You can use any number of reads to do the mapping. Whether you are going to get anything useful out of the mapping is the real question.

    What species do you work with and what kind of analysis (counts/discovery) are you looking to do?

    Comment

    • Sergio.pv
      Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 21

      #3
      Hi GenoMax,
      thank you for the quick reply.
      I work with cattle and I would like to do counts analysis.

      Comment

      • AllSeq
        Registered Vendor
        • Oct 2013
        • 138

        #4
        Even with just counting I generally wouldn't recommend less than 1M reads per sample. But I'm curious to hear about other people's guidelines for miRNA-seq
        AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
        [email protected]
        www.AllSeq.com

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        5 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        50 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        109 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...