Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vinz
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 80

    Primerdimer/Short Product Bias on the MiSeq

    Primerdimers are more efficient in cluster formation than longer products.
    Our data suggests that the extent of this preference can be influenced by sample preparation after (!) cleanup. Anyone has a guess or even knowledge what step / how one could influence the ratio of primerdimer clusters versus normal size products?
    Denaturing conditions?
    Handling times?
    Temperatures?
    HT1 buffer?

    Background: We experienced that the rate of primerdimer rate is changing over time. In particular we have one example of 8 pools of samples that were cleaned up together but put on different runs. They show a marked difference in primerdimer rate that can not be explained by the nature of the samples.
  • nefertitichen
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 2

    #2
    I would try to get rid of the primer dimers with AMPure beads before pooling for sequencing.

    Comment

    • thomasblomquist
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 68

      #3
      Post-PCR cleanup of multiplex amplicon library prep is almost a given. Ampure beads, gel electrophoresis and band cut out, column exclusions, etc, are all decent options for Illumina library prep clean up and removal of primer dimers.

      This is not the same thing as universal multiplex pcr library amplification which has a single primer that amplifies all products that have a common adapter attached on each end.

      That being said, annealing temperature and time is key to minimization primer dimer formation, as well as any sort of off-target priming. There is a direct correlation between the specificity of the priming and annealing temperature. Conversely there is an inverse relationship with cycle-to-cycle yield/efficiency. Another consideration is to back off of primer concentration if specific primers are giving non-specific dimerization products.

      Remember, PCR is a COMPLEX enzymatic reaction, with a lot of potential side reactions if you don't optimize the kinetics favorably for the desired product formation.

      Regards,

      -Tom Blomquist

      Comment

      • snetmcom
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2008
        • 159

        #4
        Pippin Prep
        Ampure Cleanup
        EGel

        It usually takes 2 rounds of cleanup to fully remove most byproducts.
        All of these options will be easier than trying to configure cluster generation.
        Last edited by snetmcom; 02-21-2014, 06:43 PM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...