Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • meggie.gr
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 3

    No 28S peak

    Hey,

    I am using Direct-zol™ RNA MiniPrep to isolate my total RNA from cells in TRIzol. I did isolate it and run bioanalyzer - results in attachment. I am clearly missing 28S peak, material is coming from M.lignano, flatworm. Any ideas? Bioanalyzer also gives an error: unexpected signal at 5S. Is my RNA degraded? Thanks a lot!
    Attached Files
  • kwaraska
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 131

    #2
    While I know nothing about your organism, I do know that if you denature drosophila RNA the peaks are virtually on top of each other-more like a doublet than two distinct peaks-whereas if you don't denature it they resolve better.

    Maybe try running it non-denatured and see what you get?

    Comment

    • MLog
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 36

      #3
      "material is coming from M.lignano" - Do you mean Macrostomum lignano, a flatworm? I recently extracted RNA from another flatworm, Opistorchis, and it looks exactly the same.
      THis is actually not rare for invertebrates, i've seen the same for snails, amphipods etc.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • meggie.gr
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 3

        #4
        Originally posted by MLog View Post
        "material is coming from M.lignano" - Do you mean Macrostomum lignano, a flatworm? I recently extracted RNA from another flatworm, Opistorchis, and it looks exactly the same.
        THis is actually not rare for invertebrates, i've seen the same for snails, amphipods etc.
        Yes, I am working with flatworms. I indeed see that more often while testing other flatworm species. In denaturing conditions the bigger subunit dissociates and forms two smaller, which seems to overlap with 18S. Thanks for the feedback!

        Comment

        • meggie.gr
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 3

          #5
          Originally posted by kwaraska View Post
          While I know nothing about your organism, I do know that if you denature drosophila RNA the peaks are virtually on top of each other-more like a doublet than two distinct peaks-whereas if you don't denature it they resolve better.

          Maybe try running it non-denatured and see what you get?
          Thanks a lot! You are totally correct. We confirmed that with running both: my total RNA and Drospohila RNA on the gel. Peaks looks similar too. Thanks again!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Today, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...