Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vanillasky
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 42

    SMarter Low RNA Input Kit

    So I have used the SMarter Low RNA Input Kit and after illumina sequencing with an NEB kit we found out that the sequencing pretty much failed. Although I've contacted the company regarding the results I have yet to receive any tech support. The following attachment shows the dscDNA output as measured with a High Sensitivity Kit. The pattern resembles their control outcome described in the manual. Any input would help me figure out where things went wrong.
    Attached Files
  • Simone78
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 208

    #2
    Why don´t you try Smart-seq2+Nextera instead? It would be much cheaper...at least up to the pre-amplification step! Your RNA seems to be degraded, do you have a positive control ? You could do RNA extraction from bulk, take 1 ng and do 12-14 cycles PCR. You should get plenty of cDNA.

    Comment

    • vanillasky
      Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 42

      #3
      I picked this kit because I am working with low amounts of degraded RNA and this kit was specifically developed for low input pg-ng and for samples that are degraded. The RNA was extracted from a marine sediment. What do you mean by 12-14 cycles of PCR?

      Comment

      • Simone78
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 208

        #4
        I mean that after RT you would need 12-14 cycles of PCR to get enough DNA that you can continue with library prep (and check on the Bioanalyzer).

        Comment

        • efrainrib
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 3

          #5
          I've been using the SMARTER total RNA-seq kit to make libraries from nuclear RNA, ranging from 1-10ng. Honestly when I go under 1ng my libraries are not there. However, from 1-10 ng we have made over 100 libraries that look like the traces provided at the end of the clontech manual. We've probably tried upwards of 150... so you can do the math and see the throughput. We've sequenced it already and are working on the analysis of the data, and from our end everything about the kit looks as advertised. would be happy to answer any more questions in depth if youre still doing this stuff

          Comment

          • NextGenSeq
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 482

            #6
            We use the NuGen RNA-Seq V2. If your RNA is degraded use the FFPE RNA-Seq V2.

            It works with anything.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              Today, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            39 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...