Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sergio.pv
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 21

    #1

    fastq_quality_filter -p 100 or could be less?

    Hello everyone,
    I am using FASTX-toolkit to filter my data (small RNA fraction for miRNA analyses) according to quality.
    I use the following settings:
    fastq_quality_filter -v -q 17 -p 100 -Q 33

    This means, that the output will consist in reads where 100% nucleotides are >=17 phred score.

    However, when doing that I loss a big amount of reads. For example:
    Quality cut-off: 17
    Minimum percentage: 100
    Input: 95428 reads.
    Output: 29635 reads.
    discarded 65793 (68%) low-quality reads.

    My question is, whether is there a safe trade off between using lower minimum pecentage and still having a good file for mapping.

    Thanks in advance
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Q17 is a pretty strenuous threshold, you might try 5, or better yet just do regular trimming and discard anything too short to map.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    14 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...