Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slois
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 2

    #1

    VarScan2. Strange behaviour of somatic-p-value

    Hi community of SEQanswers,

    I'm running varscan2 for somatic mutation calling following the commands of its documentation: mpileup + varscan somatic

    In order to test the effect of --somatic-p-value parameter in the number of variants called by varscan somatic, I have tried different p-values and logically I obtain different number of variants in the final output. However, checking the differents outputs I see that the value of the field somatic p-value (col. 15 in the tabulated output or value SPV of col. INFO in the VCF format) is greater than the specified threshold. I expected that all the somatic variants of the output has a somatic-p-value below my threshold.

    Is there any reason to explain this behaviour? Am I doing something wrong? I would like to know whether --somatic-p-value parameter is filtering variants according its value or not.

    Thank you in advance for you answers,
    Last edited by slois; 04-03-2014, 08:01 AM.
  • slois
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 2

    #2
    Hi,

    According the documentation:
    --p-value - P-value threshold to call a heterozygote [0.99]
    --somatic-p-value - P-value threshold to call a somatic site [0.05]

    Are these parameters filtering the variants identified according its corresponding values?

    Different tests applied using different somatic p-values: (outputs are modified to fit in this post). Last two columns are the variant-p-value and somatic-p-value:

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 1
    result1.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result1.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090
    result1.snp:chr1 1111272 C T 35 2 5,41% C 55 16 22,54% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0182

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.05 (Default)
    result2.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result2.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090
    result2.snp:chr1 1111272 C T 35 2 5,41% C 55 16 22,54% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0182

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.01
    result3.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result3.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.001
    result4.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368

    Thank you

    Comment

    • vd4mindia
      Member
      • May 2013
      • 40

      #3
      I also have a same question,

      I have also ran the VarScan2 on my normal/tumor pair with p-value as 0.1 somatic p-value 0.001 and then ran the somatic filter with parameters -min-strands2 2 -min-avg-qual 30. I get very less variants that are significant. I get around 250 variants. Can anyone tell me what is the standard threshold for the p-value and somatic pvalue? Which is the paramter you have been supplying?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...