Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Christopher Sauvage
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 4

    Any pipeline to find automatically ORF in consensus sequences?

    Dear members,

    Following my 454 data assembly, sequenced from a cDNA library, I'm looking for an "automated way" to find ORF for all the consensus contig sequences. My assembly was performed with a high percentage of similarity (0.98) using CLC workbench. Unfortunately, in my favorite species, there is no complete genome available at this moment to gather any information.

    So, did anyone have already experienced this problem? How to find the true ORF with 454 contig that may contains some errors, such as false-positive insertion that shift the frame?

    Thanks a lot,
    Regards,
    Christopher
  • steven
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 269

    #2
    I think that FrameD and FrameDP can provide you exactly what you are looking for: it is a gene finding software that is designed to be robust regarding sequencing errors. If you are not working on prokaryotic genome, look for its "big brother" EuGene..
    have fun,
    s.

    Comment

    • Christopher Sauvage
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2008
      • 4

      #3
      Hi Steven

      Thanks for your help! It is really appreciated. On my side, I have found that ORF predictor may perform a similar job.
      Visit: http://proteomics.ysu.edu/tools/OrfPredictor.html for more details.

      I'll let users know how things are going on with these different softwares.

      Best regards,
      Christopher

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        You might also try ESTScan:

        Software: http://estscan.sourceforge.net/
        Paper: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=rep1&type=pdf

        Comment

        • steven
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 269

          #5
          Christopher, are you sure that ORF predictor is resistant to sequencing errors and partial ORF?
          Thanks kmcarr, i didn't know ESTScan.
          I think that FrameDP can train itself (discriminative learning), deal with noisy sequences, partial ORFs, and high variations in GC content. Plus it is not restricted to pure "ab initio" prediction, as it can integrate protein similarities. They have a web server, if you want to give it a try..
          good luck,
          s.

          Comment

          • JacquesWvdH
            Junior Member
            • May 2010
            • 3

            #6
            Hi all, I am new in this field of research.
            I have contigs from acinomyces and I want to detect and annotate ORFs to be viewed in artemis.
            I am focussing on acinomyces (and eucaryotes in the future) and I am considering the use of FramdeDP with a local NCBI-database for blasts.
            Would you agree with this choice or should I consider other options?

            Comment

            • Christopher Sauvage
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2008
              • 4

              #7
              Hi Jacques,

              I have tested the FrameDP and ORFPredictor softwares to find ORF in my NGS data. ORF predictor has reached my expectation as it is based on the blastx results of your consensus sequences to predict your (partial) ORF. It can run your analysis in batches. Moreover, when there are sequencing or assembling errors, ORF predictor is able to predict an ORF with a frame shift.

              Regards.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                by SEQadmin2


                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                ...
                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              5 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              50 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
              0 responses
              110 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...