Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • buthercup_ch
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 41

    #1

    5S rRNA contamination

    Hi everyone.

    I'm new in this world of NGS and HTS and I need some help in understanding some issues.
    I've just received a set of sequences from RNA-Seq in Illumina Platform. I personally prepared the cDNA library to be used in the sequencing reaction, starting from total RNA from gram-negative bacterial.
    To get rid of the rRNA I used RiboZero kit (for gram-negative bacteria) and the treatment was really successful, except for low amounts of 5S rRNA that still remains. But it seems that is something normal using this kit.
    The expert from the Genome Platform and my supervisor agreed in continuing with the sequencing, and it turns out that the final data contains "5S rRNA contamination"…, what is not a surprise, of course.
    I use CLC Workbench Genomics to run the data analysis. After QC analysis, sequencing seemed to be of very good quality. And after trimming, I obtained about 40% of unmapped reads, what seems reasonable. The mapping was against a Reference Genome downloaded from NCBI, containing only the chromosome.
    I run the analysis to compare "non-specific matches" (max hits = 10) and "specific matches" (max hits =1)… and in both cases I obtained a huge amount of reads that map with a small region, of about 119bp of the 5S rRNA subunit of 1 of the 5 operons that exists.
    Running a RNA-Seq analysis against the same genome, but using "rRNA" track, instead "genes" or "CDS" tracks, I obtained a mapping of about 18% to the same region.

    The question is the following. Should I be worried about the accuracy of the RNA-Seq experiment due to this contamination of 5S? Should I repeat the sequencing reaction after getting rid completely of the remaining 5S rRNA in the samples? Or in contrast, could I use the expression value obtained if I just eliminate tRNAs and rRNAs from the Reference Genome (running the analysis agains a multicast file of all genes gave almost the same result than the aligned genome)

    Thank you very much in advance
  • buthercup_ch
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 41

    #2
    An additional information:
    Comparing the analysis against "all genes" (including CDS, tRNA and rRNA genes) or "only CDS", the % of not mapped reads rise from about 40 to about 60%…, logical if we take into account about 18% mapping if we only consider rRNA gene sequences to perform the analysis.
    But…., is that 60% not mapped reads to high????

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...