Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bioman1
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 80

    Low coverge genome assembly- suggestions

    Hello,

    We have sequenced genomic sequence of fruit crop through Hiseq 2000. The data are illumina paired-end fastq reads. The raw reads are filtered using trimmomatic with default settings and test with FastQC tool. After filteration, the total sequences are reduced from 505956290 to 418812062, with %GC 38 and sequence length is 101.It passed all test with warnings in per base sequence content and sequence duplication levels.

    My single filtered fastq file size is 108Gbp and the genome size predicted through kmer genie and SGA preqc predicted to be around 2Gbp. The coverage is to be below 20x. Which genome assembler is good in assembling at low coverage?. What are the ways I can improve my genome assembly through computational approach?. Please let me know your suggestions and any pointer to journal papers which successed in assembling low coverage plant genome.
  • lorendarith

    #2
    Do you only have one single short fragment library which makes up these 20x coverage or is this a sum of different libraries?

    If you want to assemble genomes with short read technologies it is crucial to have several libraries and library types of different insert (and maybe also read) lengths.

    Is it not possible for you to sequence more or you really need to make something out of these 20x?

    Comment

    • zatelmar
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 1

      #3
      Hi - I would first consider running error correction of your reads (e.g. using musket). Are your reads paired? This would be important to improve the assembly.SOAPdenovo could be a good starting point, you could also try abyss, velvet, that are also relatively easy to install and run, though velvet could be quite memory demanding for a big dataset as yours. It is important to optimise the k-mer size, kmer genie should have suggested one already. However, with the coverage you have, you cannot expect a really high N50. Hope this helps.

      Comment

      • bioman1
        Member
        • May 2012
        • 80

        #4
        I have paired-end reads (read1.fastq, read2.fastq), which I interleaved as single.fastq file. This single fastq file has %GC 38 and sequence length is 101. This file has coverage about 20x. I cannot able to sequence more due to my boss budget, I would like to make something out these reads to make publication. Any suggestions, to make draft genome for publication.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          Yesterday, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...