Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thejustpark
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 28

    #1

    Any suggestion of tool for differential expression test for my situation?

    I am trying to get differentially expressed genes for this experiment*
    where one condition has one biological replicate (two samples) and the other condition doesn't have one (one sample).*
    I read many discussions about how bad it is to do differential expression test for no replicate samples.*

    But I am still unclear how to do the test for my situation (I believe my situation is better than completely no replicate case).*
    Can you guys suggest me a good tool for this analysis?

    Thanks,*
    HJ
  • thejustpark
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 28

    #2
    Just one more comment: the biologists said that the two conditions are expected to be not much different, only affecting a number of genes. That is another reason I think it would be OK not to require additional replicate at least at this time point.

    Comment

    • dariober
      Senior Member
      • May 2010
      • 311

      #3
      I think there is no "right" way of addressing this situation. I would use edgeR or DEseq as they implement methods designed to make the best of few replicates, although your case (2 + 1) is quite extreme.

      Rather you should interpret the results in the light of such small sample sizes. If you have some genes that are expected to change, see how they behave and see if the genes detected as different make sense in biological terms.

      That is another reason I think it would be OK not to require additional replicate at least at this time point.
      Mmm... I'd say the opposite. If the effect size you want to detect is small you should put more replicates.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        @thejustpark: Please don't cross-post on here and biostars, it just doubles the work since you get the same answer from both places.

        Comment

        • thejustpark
          Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 28

          #5
          Thank you Devon for pointing that out.
          I didn't know. I will keep that in my mind.

          HJ.

          Comment

          • Xuegong
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2014
            • 1

            #6
            Originally posted by thejustpark View Post
            I am trying to get differentially expressed genes for this experiment*
            where one condition has one biological replicate (two samples) and the other condition doesn't have one (one sample).*
            I read many discussions about how bad it is to do differential expression test for no replicate samples.*

            But I am still unclear how to do the test for my situation (I believe my situation is better than completely no replicate case).*
            Can you guys suggest me a good tool for this analysis?

            Thanks,*
            HJ
            How about doing two comparisons of each of the replicate with no-replicate sample and then check the common findings from the two comparisons? This may help to make the results more reliable. For comparing two single samples, you may check out the DEGseq tool. It's simple to use and can give reasonable results, especially when you don't have replicates to estimate more complex models. Also you may do a replicate-vs-replicate comparison first as the negative control of the difference distribution, and use this distribution to judge the significance of your real comparisons. In this way, you avoid the use of any model and parameter estimation.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...