Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stormin
    Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 23

    earliest detectable RNAseq differential expression?

    We are trying to determine the best time points to be used for detecting transient transcriptome response after treatment. Are there any studies done prior that looked at the best times for detection? Also when is the earliest detectable response recorded?

    Thanks,
    Zach
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    I hope you realize that there will be no generally applicable answer to your question.

    Comment

    • stormin
      Member
      • Aug 2014
      • 23

      #3
      But there must be a lower limit on this question. For example, 15 minutes post treatment is probably not going to be enough time for new mRNA to accumulate. Now, what about a hour? I just want to see if there are any prior study or personal experience on this. I'm sorry if the original question is confusing.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        15 minutes is probably enough for immediate early genes. There's no definition for transient. You could mean hours or days and even then there'd be no general answer (some changes will only be detectable earlier, others later). Do a pilot experiment with a few samples to have a look at things.

        Comment

        • SNPsaurus
          Registered Vendor
          • May 2013
          • 525

          #5
          Some responses are very fast. For example, my academic lab looked at low oxygen responses and when our samples were exposed to normal oxygen for just a few minutes before freezing in liquid nitrogen we saw expression changes due to reoxygenation. We used a 15 minute exposure to normal oxygen in our experiments as that gave a very robust set of gene expression changes. This was in Drosophila and Drosophila tissue culture.
          Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

          Comment

          • mbblack
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 245

            #6
            Originally posted by stormin View Post
            But there must be a lower limit on this question. For example, 15 minutes post treatment is probably not going to be enough time for new mRNA to accumulate. Now, what about a hour? I just want to see if there are any prior study or personal experience on this. I'm sorry if the original question is confusing.
            Without knowing anything about the treatment (is this a xenobiotic? - pharmaceutical or industrial chemical?, pesticide?, is it reactive or stable?, is it a small or large molecule?, or is it a dose of radiation or some other "treatment"?), the cell type (I'm assuming you are talking about some sort of in vitro treatment?) the culture conditions and so forth there is no way to even give you reasonable guesses as answers.

            Keep in mind that gene expression is the sum of all processes giving rise to a particular concentration of a particular mRNA at any given time. There are small molecules that can have an affect on measured gene expression almost instantly upon exposure. There are xenobiotics which will induce several cascades of expression changes over time from the first few hours to days out from initial exposure. Often your limitation for long term exposures is simple cell viability, but you may detect adaptive changes in gene expression profiles for as long as you can keep the cells alive.

            The "best" time for sampling will vary tremendously depending on the specifics of the treatment, and the cell type being exposed. A pilot study is really the only way to pick good exposure(s) and time ponts for your particular treatment and cell type. Relying on results from other studies of different compounds or cell types is really not much better than pure guessing in most instances. Even using IVIVE (In vivo to In vitro extrapolation) to compute cellular exposures from animal studies has not been a guarantee of success in my experience, when working with the identical compound.
            Last edited by mbblack; 09-09-2014, 06:41 AM.
            Michael Black, Ph.D.
            ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...