Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yao_licr
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 7

    Methylation in the + strand influence the expression of gene in the - strand?

    Hi all,
    I have a general question about how the methylation within the TSS 1000 bp will influence the expression of the gene?

    It is easy to understand that if the methylation happens in the same strand as the gene sits, it will potentially repress the expression of the corresponding gene; but if the methylation (within TSS 1000 bp) happens in the + strand, so could it potentially repress the corresponding gene in the - strand as well? Is there any literature about that?

    Thanks a lot!

    Yao
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    It's highly likely that methylation on the + strand can affect transcription on the - strand. I've never read a paper that showed that, but I've also never looked.

    Comment

    • volks
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 80

      #3
      most CpGs in the genome are either unmethylated or methylated on both strands (CG is a palindromic sequence). any hemi-methylated CpGs are quickly methylated on both strands by DNMT1 (that is what is happening for every cellular replication cycle). i am not aware of any finding that would answer your question more appropriately.

      Comment

      • hamarillo
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2012
        • 1

        #4
        Bottom line is, how could enzymes distinguish which strand they are methylating?

        when you perform a sequencing experiment and on the analysis you find that there is no equilibrium between the methylation at - and + strands; is it an indicator of an experimental artefact or a sequencer failure?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...