Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Peppe
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 11

    BLAST comparison between two sets of sequences

    Hello everyone,
    I have a set of sequences generated with Trinity and I want to compare them with S. cerevisiae. I have downloaded the S. cerevisiae protein set from the SGD. Since S. cerevisiae is a reference organism, I need to name my transcripts using S. cerevisiae nomenclature.
    For the comparison I used BLASTx. Although the BLASTx itself is quite easy to do using the Windows version of BLAST 2.2.29+, I run into the problem that I cannot get S. cerevisiae gene names.

    As an example, one protein is indicated as
    >YAL001C TFC3 SGDID:S000000001, Chr I from 151006-147594,151166-151097, Genome Release 64-1-1, reverse complement, Verified ORF, "Largest of six subunits of the RNA polymerase III transcription initiation factor complex (TFIIIC); part of the TauB domain of TFIIIC that binds DNA at the BoxB promoter sites of tRNA and similar genes; cooperates with Tfc6p in DNA binding"

    I run BLASTx using several flags (eg -outfmt 6 or -outfmt 7 -qseqid -sseqid -stitle), but the only thing that I get is the systematic name (i.e. YAL001C) but not the gene name and the description (i.e. TFC3 etc.).

    Have anybody run into the same problem? Do you guys have any advice? Doing manually the blast one by one of ~1000 sequences is going to drive me nuts!
    Thanks a lot
  • amitm
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 52

    #2
    hi Peppe,
    YAL001C is a locus tag. A dirty solution would be to get the Blast result and then do an ID conversion from Locus tag to gene symbol.
    Gene anno. info is available for all Fungi from NCBI ftp -
    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/DATA...i.gene_info.gz

    The file has symbols for all locus tags.
    The first col of the file is the taxon ID. For Yeast that is 559292

    Comment

    • Peppe
      Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 11

      #3
      Thanks amitm.
      In the way you said should I do the conversion manually? Or is there an informatic way?
      Best.

      Comment

      • amitm
        Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 52

        #4
        hi,
        Once you have a list of Locus Tag IDs, the gene symbol can be retrieved from the above file by using vlookup formula in excel.
        The easiest way would have been to use an online ID conversion tool. But two that I know (DAVID and CNIO) either didn't recognize the locus tag ID or didn't support Yeast.

        I would have gone with excel. Least hand-on time

        Comment

        • Peppe
          Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 11

          #5
          Thanks amitm,
          I did and it worked fine. Now I have gene names for all my transcripts. By change do you know how to have also Saccharomyces gene descriptions? This would be ideal.

          I think in BLAST someone can use several flags to select whatever he wants, but for some reason it does not work for my data sets.
          Thanks.

          Comment

          • amitm
            Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 52

            #6
            hi Peppe,
            Did you use the file from NCBI ftp? It has the gene description also, as in the full name, if thats what you meant. If you are looking for possible functions then it would be gene ontology. If you go up to the parent directory in the ftp, i.e. - ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/DATA/

            The gene2go.gz file has GO description for every gene. You could filter this file based on the GeneID (2nd col).

            Alternatively, since you have the gene symbols, you could use online GO classification tools like DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp)

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...