Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HTS_Newby
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 1

    ITS1 amplicon sequencing with Nextera indices

    Hi folks,

    Sorry for putting very basic questions here. I am very new to NGS and I have planned to perform ITS1 amplicon sequencing on MiSeq. I have combed through several articles and found that 2x250 PE would be a suitable option for me. Anyway, I have some questions about indexing.

    1. I have ca. 50 samples in which I would like to multiplex them. In this case, single or double index is better? And may you briefly explain differentations between the two systems or suggest a publication for further reading?

    2. In case of double index, is it possible to use Nextera indices or other custom indices generated for bacterial 16s metagenomics for fungal ITS? I understand that they should be fine as long as I have both color channels in each base positions. Can you suggest if there is any I should be aware of?

    Thank you in advance!
  • cliffbeall
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 144

    #2
    Originally posted by HTS_Newby View Post
    Hi folks,

    Sorry for putting very basic questions here. I am very new to NGS and I have planned to perform ITS1 amplicon sequencing on MiSeq. I have combed through several articles and found that 2x250 PE would be a suitable option for me. Anyway, I have some questions about indexing.

    1. I have ca. 50 samples in which I would like to multiplex them. In this case, single or double index is better? And may you briefly explain differentations between the two systems or suggest a publication for further reading?
    Dual indices will save on primer synthesis - you can do more samples with fewer primers because of the combinatorial effect.
    Originally posted by HTS_Newby View Post
    2. In case of double index, is it possible to use Nextera indices or other custom indices generated for bacterial 16s metagenomics for fungal ITS? I understand that they should be fine as long as I have both color channels in each base positions. Can you suggest if there is any I should be aware of?

    Thank you in advance!
    The Illumina 16S metagenomic library prep guide says:

    "The method described in this 16S Metagenomics protocol can be used for any targeted amplicon sequencing, relevant to virus research, mutation detection, or other microbiology‐ related studies."

    I think you could look at that protocol and substitute in your gene specific sequences for the ones there (bacterial 16S V3V4). I think you need to sign up on their website, but you probably want to do that anyway.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    34 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...