Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aka
    Junior Member
    • May 2013
    • 2

    Long primers for illumina sequencing

    Hello, I was trying to run a pcr for downstream illumina sequencing; and the primers are specifically designed for this purpose (with Illumina adapters and barcodes), so the primers end up been very long (>65 bp).

    The regular primers (without Illumina adapters and barcodes) worked pretty well. However, the products from Illumina primers look like smears but not clear bands on the gel. Anyone have encountered the same problem before? Any ideas about the optimization would help. Thanks!
  • JamieHeather
    @jamimmunology
    • Nov 2012
    • 96

    #2
    A simple way to get around any problems associated with long primers is to only use the long primers for as few cycles as possible, before doing the majority of your cycles using shorter primers at the very ends of your amplicons.

    So, you can do say 1-4 cycles with your full-length primers (the fewer the better), purify, then amplify just with the outermost sequences. You can even do it all in the same reaction vessel, with the long primers in a limiting concentration so the shorter primers outcompete after their binding site has been added.

    Comment

    • microgirl123
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 199

      #3
      Illumina just published a bulletin with a 16s metagenomics protocol - https://my.illumina.com/MyIllumina/B...mic-sequencing. You can easily adapt it for any locus. We've been successfully using an adaptation of this for a while.

      Comment

      • TonyBrooks
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 303

        #4
        What are you attempting to amplify?
        We successfully use our ~65bp primers to generate metagenomic libraries without problems (insert ~370bp).
        The Illumina metagenomic method is way too expensive for us (twice as many PCR reactions plus Ilumina adapters are EXPENSIVE).

        Comment

        • Kumari Richa
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 5

          #5
          Hi,

          I have used 515F/926R primers for amplifying hypervariable regions of 16SrRNA gene. I see multiple bands in the gel. Why is this so? Has anyone else experienced this? What is the other band(s) ?

          Thanks
          Richa

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
            What are you attempting to amplify?
            We successfully use our ~65bp primers to generate metagenomic libraries without problems (insert ~370bp).
            The Illumina metagenomic method is way too expensive for us (twice as many PCR reactions plus Ilumina adapters are EXPENSIVE).
            Hi Tony,
            The step-out adapters are just oligos, so you could order them from some place other than Illumina.

            Are the extra PCR reactions costly? It might work to add the internal, locus-specific, primers and the step-out (index + distal adapter) oligos straight into the initial reaction. Or would that just make a mess?

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • addyblanch
              Member
              • Jul 2012
              • 29

              #7
              Are you trying to do something like TraDIS? We had a go and ended up using abridged illumina primers for it to work successfully. But even with this when quantified using bioanyliser they were all different lengths. However it did produce data.

              Comment

              • TonyBrooks
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2009
                • 303

                #8
                Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
                Hi Tony,
                The step-out adapters are just oligos, so you could order them from some place other than Illumina.

                Are the extra PCR reactions costly? It might work to add the internal, locus-specific, primers and the step-out (index + distal adapter) oligos straight into the initial reaction. Or would that just make a mess?

                --
                Phillip
                We could have ordered the oligos separately and not used the Illumina ones.
                PCR reactions aren't costly when you do a few - when you have 5,000 samples to process, then it becomes an issue and saving even small amounts per reaction add up to being able to do extra sequencing runs.
                We did also thought about adding all four primers into one reaction but we were worried that funky things might start happening.
                Our dual oligo/dual index approach is working well though, no problems with duff oligos or freeze-thaw issues yet and getting >80% >Q30 on a 500 cycle v2 kit.

                Comment

                • Mghanbari
                  Junior Member
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 3

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
                  What are you attempting to amplify?
                  We successfully use our ~65bp primers to generate metagenomic libraries without problems (insert ~370bp).
                  The Illumina metagenomic method is way too expensive for us (twice as many PCR reactions plus Ilumina adapters are EXPENSIVE).
                  Hi Tony Brooks

                  I was wondering if you could let me know about the protocol you used for amplicon sequencing on MiSeq?

                  Thanks
                  Mahdi

                  Comment

                  • TonyBrooks
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 303

                    #10
                    I'll summarise below

                    The primers are as follows. I won't put the P5/P7 sequences in here as the are (c) Illumina. You should be able to find them by Googling. Make sure you use the paired end P5 & P7

                    P5[i5 Index]ACGTACGTACGTGGATTAGATACCCBRGTAGTC
                    P7[i7 Index]AGTCAGTCAGCCACGTCRTCCCCDCCTTCCTC

                    Once PCR is done, we clean up using 0.8X Ampure beads. We do two rounds of clean up, but because we're cheap, we reuse the beads. After you elute in 10mM Tris, add 0.8X of 2.5M NaCL/20% PEG-8000 to re-bind the DNA to the beads. Incubate for 5 mins, remove supernatent, wash 2X with 80% EtOH and finally elute in 30µL. We QC a random selection on the Bioanalyser DNA 1000 chip to make sure we have product and no dimer. Then we quantify with the Qubit and pool for sequencing.

                    The template specific part of the primers are in red. The sequences shown here are 16S 785F and 1175R for interrogation of V5-7. You can replace these with whatever you target, but you'll also need to redesign your read primers if you do.

                    The sequence upstream of this is random sequence that finds no match when we blast it. It allows us to also use long custom primers with the required Tm > 65ºC

                    Read 1 ACGTACGTACGTGGATTAGATACCCBRGTAGTC - spike 5µL of 100µM into well #12 of MiSeq cartridge
                    Index Read GAGGAAGGHGGGGAYGACGTGGCTGACTGACT - spike 5µL of 100µM primer into well #13 of MiSeq cartridge (rev comp of read 2)
                    Read 2 AGTCAGTCAGCCACGTCRTCCCCDCCTTCCTC - spike 5µL of 100µM into well #14 of MiSeq cartridge

                    We use extra long P10 tips in order to be sure we dispense the primers into the mix already in the cartridge. You have to spike in rather than use custom mixes so that the PhiX spike in (we use 10%) is also primed and read.

                    DON'T SET THE MISEQ UP TO USE CUSTOM PRIMERS!! This will make the MiSeq attempt to aspirate from wells #18-#20 which will be empty.

                    Then set the run up as per the MiSeq protocol.

                    Comment

                    • Mghanbari
                      Junior Member
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 3

                      #11
                      Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
                      I'll summarise below

                      The primers are as follows. I won't put the P5/P7 sequences in here as the are (c) Illumina. You should be able to find them by Googling. Make sure you use the paired end P5 & P7

                      P5[i5 Index]ACGTACGTACGTGGATTAGATACCCBRGTAGTC
                      P7[i7 Index]AGTCAGTCAGCCACGTCRTCCCCDCCTTCCTC

                      Once PCR is done, we clean up using 0.8X Ampure beads. We do two rounds of clean up, but because we're cheap, we reuse the beads. After you elute in 10mM Tris, add 0.8X of 2.5M NaCL/20% PEG-8000 to re-bind the DNA to the beads. Incubate for 5 mins, remove supernatent, wash 2X with 80% EtOH and finally elute in 30µL. We QC a random selection on the Bioanalyser DNA 1000 chip to make sure we have product and no dimer. Then we quantify with the Qubit and pool for sequencing.

                      The template specific part of the primers are in red. The sequences shown here are 16S 785F and 1175R for interrogation of V5-7. You can replace these with whatever you target, but you'll also need to redesign your read primers if you do.

                      The sequence upstream of this is random sequence that finds no match when we blast it. It allows us to also use long custom primers with the required Tm > 65ºC

                      Read 1 ACGTACGTACGTGGATTAGATACCCBRGTAGTC - spike 5µL of 100µM into well #12 of MiSeq cartridge
                      Index Read GAGGAAGGHGGGGAYGACGTGGCTGACTGACT - spike 5µL of 100µM primer into well #13 of MiSeq cartridge (rev comp of read 2)
                      Read 2 AGTCAGTCAGCCACGTCRTCCCCDCCTTCCTC - spike 5µL of 100µM into well #14 of MiSeq cartridge

                      We use extra long P10 tips in order to be sure we dispense the primers into the mix already in the cartridge. You have to spike in rather than use custom mixes so that the PhiX spike in (we use 10%) is also primed and read.

                      DON'T SET THE MISEQ UP TO USE CUSTOM PRIMERS!! This will make the MiSeq attempt to aspirate from wells #18-#20 which will be empty.

                      Then set the run up as per the MiSeq protocol.

                      Many thanks Tony!

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • GATTACAT
                        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by GATTACAT
                        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by SEQadmin2


                        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                      0 responses
                      21 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                      0 responses
                      21 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                      0 responses
                      21 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      54 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...